Compare cert salaries and plan your next career move
Slowhand wrote: Your best might be to start with A+ and Network+, to gauge yourself and see where your skills are, versus what's expected of you. It'll also give you a chance to start doing some hands-on practice with computer hardware, software, and networking equipment. Once you have them, working towards the CCNA is a good idea, or you can look at other certs like Linux+, Server+, the Microsoft path, or any other number of things out there. The best thing you can do, though, seeing as how you have no formal experience in the field, is to make sure that you set up equipment at home to practice with. It doesn't have to be work experience you put on your resume, (but that helps,) you just need to make sure that you've actually used and trained with the technologies you're getting certified on. Good luck on your journey, and let us know how you're progressing. Don't be afraid to ask questions, we're always happy to help. If you need any more resources on certs or places to start, (like what books are recommended, how to set up your labs, specific models of routers/switches/servers you need,) I'm sure we can point you in the right direction there as well.
Kevy wrote: I Have been checking loads of other websites about certification and the view that i got is that ,its a total waste of time and money pursuing A+ and N+ , Just wanted to know your honest opinion on this,i have been, i want to get into Networking and i have decided to sit for N+ in March and then take the two way route to CNNA
Thiassi wrote: Personally, I would do both the A+ and N+ apply for some jobs. You'll get a helpdesk role and then study for the higher level exams so you can move onto another job later on with both the qualifications AND experience. You'll then have a load more opportunities.
jarjar wrote: Just my 2 cents. If it doesn't apply, let it fly. A+ with no experience = New guy (gal) on my team CNNA with no experience = There is no way I am going to hire this guy/gal and let them touch my router/firewall/switches, and since they can't troubleshoot basic computer issues I won't hire them.
Tesl wrote: jarjar wrote: Just my 2 cents. If it doesn't apply, let it fly. A+ with no experience = New guy (gal) on my team CNNA with no experience = There is no way I am going to hire this guy/gal and let them touch my router/firewall/switches, and since they can't troubleshoot basic computer issues I won't hire them. This post strikes me as a complete waste of space, since it apparently only applies to people working in your particular IT team. Since there are far more IT positions around world wide, and since the odds of him working for you are almost 0, the post above appears absolutely ridiculous. To the AP, ignore jarjar unless it is him you really want to work for. His post holds true nowhere else.
Thiassi wrote: Tesl wrote: jarjar wrote: Just my 2 cents. If it doesn't apply, let it fly. A+ with no experience = New guy (gal) on my team CNNA with no experience = There is no way I am going to hire this guy/gal and let them touch my router/firewall/switches, and since they can't troubleshoot basic computer issues I won't hire them. This post strikes me as a complete waste of space, since it apparently only applies to people working in your particular IT team. Since there are far more IT positions around world wide, and since the odds of him working for you are almost 0, the post above appears absolutely ridiculous. To the AP, ignore jarjar unless it is him you really want to work for. His post holds true nowhere else. I'm sorry but a little common sense wouldn't go amiss here. Jarjar is obviously using an example from his own experience to prove a universal truth. If you have qualifications with no hands on experience to match then no (or very, very few) right minded people will want you using their live environment as a test bench for your newly gained knowledge. So what jarjar said DOES make sense and it DOES apply to this thread. Your post, on the other hand, is an actual "waste of space",
Tesl wrote: I probably need to stop reading these forums though, I can't cope with the overwhelming "Aim Low" attitude that comes across so much...
sprkymrk wrote: Tesl wrote: I probably need to stop reading these forums though, I can't cope with the overwhelming "Aim Low" attitude that comes across so much... No offence to you, but if you go back through your posts in the forums many of them are themselves "aim low", so you generally get back what you put in.
I remember just recently instead of simply saying something like "I disagree, here is what I think" you called another member a helpdesk lacky.
And you started this one off pretty low yourself. Rather than just disagreeing with jarjar you called his post a waste of space, ridiculous, and stated that he should be ignored. How low is that? An apology after a harsh post is commendable, but don't start a food fight and then complain when you get hit with an egg.
Tesl wrote: I don't want to get into a rant here, my issue with these boards sometimes is that people seem never willing to encourage people to take a bit of a chance and really go for it. Maybe I don't understand the US market well enough and perhaps that genuinely is the best way to go, but I don't believe it myself. I'm a true "Aim for the stars and you might hit the moon" type of person, its done me *extremely* well in life and think more people should have the confidence to have a crack at the big time.
Tesl wrote: sprkymrk wrote: Tesl wrote: I probably need to stop reading these forums though, I can't cope with the overwhelming "Aim Low" attitude that comes across so much... No offence to you, but if you go back through your posts in the forums many of them are themselves "aim low", so you generally get back what you put in. Not true. Feel free to quote them otherwise. I remember just recently instead of simply saying something like "I disagree, here is what I think" you called another member a helpdesk lacky. That was blargoe probably. And you started this one off pretty low yourself. Rather than just disagreeing with jarjar you called his post a waste of space, ridiculous, and stated that he should be ignored. How low is that? An apology after a harsh post is commendable, but don't start a food fight and then complain when you get hit with an egg. I'll apologise again it was worded too harshly. I stand by what I meant though. I don't want to get into a rant here, my issue with these boards sometimes is that people seem never willing to encourage people to take a bit of a chance and really go for it. Maybe I don't understand the US market well enough and perhaps that genuinely is the best way to go, but I don't believe it myself. I'm a true "Aim for the stars and you might hit the moon" type of person, its done me *extremely* well in life and think more people should have the confidence to have a crack at the big time. Anyways. I will once again apologise to Jarjar for the overly harsh wording, but I stand by what I said.
nehalchauhan wrote: Hi I am Nehal from Uk, Isle of Wight. I have decided the same and going for N+ and A+ exam. Let me know hw you are studying from which book, Websites etc. Regards
Kevy wrote: hey guys jusst wanted to let you know about my progress on getting into the filed, i'm on study leave from next week and i will be sitting for Comptia N+ Exams early MARCH Will let you know how it went.
Compare salaries for top cybersecurity certifications. Free download for TechExams community.