Mishra wrote: Exchange also uses NLB. Quite a few other off brand applications let you use NLB. It's a good skill to know.
donald7862003 wrote: Mishra wrote: Exchange also uses NLB. Quite a few other off brand applications let you use NLB. It's a good skill to know. I thought that NLB wasnt good for exchange because the information isnt static like a web server.
Mishra wrote: Okay I think I see where you are thinking. You wouldn't use NLB on your back-end exchange servers that do all the processing. You would setup front end servers that use NLB to direct mail traffic. There are many advantages like security, single namespace, OWA, RPC for using the front end servers.
donald7862003 wrote: Mishra wrote: Okay I think I see where you are thinking. You wouldn't use NLB on your back-end exchange servers that do all the processing. You would setup front end servers that use NLB to direct mail traffic. There are many advantages like security, single namespace, OWA, RPC for using the front end servers. Okay I see what you are saying
donald7862003 wrote: donald7862003 wrote: Mishra wrote: Okay I think I see where you are thinking. You wouldn't use NLB on your back-end exchange servers that do all the processing. You would setup front end servers that use NLB to direct mail traffic. There are many advantages like security, single namespace, OWA, RPC for using the front end servers. Okay I see what you are saying Could you also explain how that would work? Front end servers fowarding mail traffic using NLB. I cant see it in my head how i would set that up thanks