Compare cert salaries and plan your next career move
kafifi13 wrote: » My other biggest complaint which i've expressed is practice tests. All of the practice tests that are out there in my opinion is garabage compared to the real thing. I mean some tests are either too easy or are not like the real exam at all. I'm not asking for a test with similar answers but something with a good sim or two in it and soem really hard questions like the ones you will get on the exam.
accely wrote: » I agree here. I find it kind of annoying how I can get every simulation correct in the practice exams but on the real thing they are completely different. They are definitely wayy too easy on the CD-ROM from Cisco Press BSCI 4th Edition. I'm trying to think of what I should try next.
miller811 wrote: » Did you purchase the lab guide for BSCI? In my opinion it is a must have to pass the exam. I finally passed after my third attempt. I was also caught off guard, since it was my first professional level exam.... and it made me realize that is was named correctly, professional. The practice exams in the Cisco books are more along the lines of the Associate exam, easy questions, facts and figures... But for BSCI you need to know the material inside and out, and that will come from doing it in the lab, looking at debugs etc. Good luck,
EdTheLad wrote: » I don't see the point of practice questions, you either totally understand a subject matter or you don't.There is no in between, if you need questions to access your understanding of a topic it means you are fooling yourself.
kafifi13 wrote: » I bought Transcender and I think that's garbage as well. I mean on the real exam they don't ask you all the subjects in order..you go from OSPF, to BGP, back to OSPF, IPV6. You guys know what i mean? I guess i needed to vent and you are the only people that know what i'm talking about.
EdTheLad wrote: » I never use practice questions. I don't see the point of practice questions, you either totally understand a subject matter or you don't.There is no in between, if you need questions to access your understanding of a topic it means you are fooling yourself. To access a topic i create scenarios and think about how a certain protocol should behave, if i'm unsure of certain behavior i lab it up and do some additional reading.
paxb wrote: » There's often a big difference between knowing a subject inside out and being able to pass an exam on it with distinction (which is what is necessary with Cisco certs). During the course of studying you have dissected and visualised the material in a particular way which makes sense to you. However when you come to sit an exam on it you are confronted with scenarios drawn from someone else's visualisation of the subject matter. Of course there are some people lucky enough to be able to visualise things in all sorts of ways. These people would never have much need for practice exams. But I believe most people need these practice exams to get used to the variety of ways questions could be posed. I personally used moderated **** used to **** to practice for the CCNA exam. It was invaluable. I recommend it to anyone looking for pre-exam practice for the CCNP exams as well. I'm just about to start study on my first CCNP component (BCMSN) and I most definitely have no intention of failing any of them at any point. That is not a difficult goal if the proper exam question practice is put in in combination with the requisite study.
paxb wrote: » There's often a big difference between knowing a subject inside out and being able to pass an exam on it with distinction (which is what is necessary with Cisco certs).
paxb wrote: » I personally used moderated **** used to **** to practice for the CCNA exam.
paxb wrote: » I'm just about to start study on my first CCNP component (BCMSN) and I most definitely have no intention of failing any of them at any point. That is not a difficult goal if the proper exam question practice is put in in combination with the requisite study.
itsme1672 wrote: » Don't expect to be able answer any multicast question by just watching CBTnuggest multicasting. It's a joke. They cover Multicasting in one video, no commands, no debug ip mrouting analyzing. Pathetic. SAme with IPv6, very poor coverage of CBT nuggets. There is no way to pass this exam unless you dig into this stuff by reading all the books available and practice with 4 routers in a lab environment for 6 months in a row.
itsme1672 wrote: » Don't expect to be able answer any multicast question by just watching CBTnuggest multicasting.
AlexMR wrote: » 6 months? Jeez...Ive spent one month studying for this exam and Im certainly not close to being ready, but 6 months sound little way too much. I think a more reasonable metric should be hours of study. It's something that i would like to know to at least establish a reasonable goal date. I am currently studying for this exam and I wanted to say this thread is scary. Seriously.
Compare salaries for top cybersecurity certifications. Free download for TechExams community.