Compare cert salaries and plan your next career move
MrAgent wrote: » Clearances dont cost the companies sponsoring you anything except the pay they have to pay you while waiting for it. Which is why they generally dont take people on who arent already cleared. The people who incur the cost of the investigations are the DSS (at least for the DoD). Other departments/agencies use a different system. The costs they incur are just whatever it is to go door to door talking to former coworkers, neighbors, etc. A good friend of mine who works with me, but for another company, is the security officer for his company. So I have a pretty good idea of what happens.
MrAgent wrote: » Clearances dont cost the companies sponsoring you anything except the pay they have to pay you while waiting for it. Which is why they generally dont take people on who arent already cleared.
passcert23 wrote: » I did not know that. I currently have a secret clearance. What is stopping my employee from upgrading my secret to a TS? All this time I thought it was about money but since you say the employee does not incurred any cost...
tpatt100 wrote: » I wish the government would work on some alternative clearance requirement. I know several people who would be great employees yet lack clearances. So the better pay goes to lesser qualified people who happen to have clearances because they were in the military.
Computadora wrote: » Correct me if I am wrong, but I heard that some companies are now making employees sign an agreement that they must serve a certain period of employment with them after receiving their sponsored security clearance, in order to stop them from just gaining the clearance and running away, is any of this any true? Even if they do not have an agreement, I am sure the hiring manager most likely will not give a favorable recommendation if one just gains the clearance and runs?
Compare salaries for top cybersecurity certifications. Free download for TechExams community.