Compare cert salaries and plan your next career move
johnnynodough wrote: Im no expert on OSPF/EIGRP, but here is what I have taken from using wildcard masks with these RPs. Lets say your router has three interfaces, 10.1.2.1, 10.1.3.1, and 10.1.4.1. You can make all three interfaces particpate in the exchange of routing information with one fell swoop command, 10.0.0.0 0.255.255.255. But you can use the three individual commands, to remove any ambiguity as to which interfaces are exchanging router updates, by using the three interface commands 10.1.2.1 0.0.0.0, etc. Another example would be if you had three interfaces on a router, ips 10.1.2.1, 10.1.3.1 and 10.1.4.1, and you dont want 10.1.4.1 included in the routing updates. If you used the 10.0.0.0 0.255.255.255 net command then that 10.1.4.1 interface would participate in routing. So individual net commands would eliminate that. You could also issue a 10.1.0.0 0.0.3.255 net command, and it would only put the 10.1.2.1 and 10.1.3.1 interfaces in the routing exchanges.
QUIX0TIC wrote: I personally think it is the reverse mask wildcard that is the "more correct" answer. But, this question has been asked multiple times and I am personally sticking with the reverse mask. Its worked for me so far. Ill be taking the test pretty soon... in a couple of weeks or so and if I get a similar question... I can tell you then.
Compare salaries for top cybersecurity certifications. Free download for TechExams community.