Network Engineer Phone Screen

Well I have a phone screen for a Network Engineer Job on Monday. I have been reviewing my CCNA level stuff (as this is a CCNA/CCNP job) and they are looking for someone to join their team and grow--quickly. At any rate I am trying to think of things I should not F up, any ideas good people of TE? For those of you are are in network engineering (and in hiring roles) what types of things do you look for in JRs? Anything you guys think I should ask?

Find more posts tagged with

Comments

Bl8ckr0uter

phoeneous wrote: »

But you don't have to learn them all. I've said this before, you are only hurting yourself. Mental capacity can only go so far. Know what you manage, manage what you know.

I know, I know but let me explain...

L0gicB0mb508 wrote: »

Pick a clear path and stick with it. If you happen to get a job that requires something, then you should deviate form the plan and study. If you intend on getting into packet analysis or IDS type work, stick with it. Don't stop mid studying on the Wireshark cert to go study VMware or something unless it is absolutely needed by your job.

Not like that. It's like this, I want to be a security/network analyst/engineer so I know I need to have a solid foundation of networking. But which part of networking? Wired or Wireless (IMO both)? Voice or Data (IMO both)? Wan or Lan (IMO both)? Then of course solid understanding of Intrusion and attack vectors and how to defend them (GCIA/GPEN/GCED). So it isn't like I am stopping Wireshark to go study like storage (in depth anyway) but how can you look at packets on a network if you don't understand networking (at least on a moderately deep level). How can you tell if your san is flaking out if you don't understand normal san operation? How can you baseline what you don't understand? That's what I mean by so many things. I have decided I don't want to be a developer (full time) or dba or exchange admin (I hate exchange) BUT I do want to be a networking guy, a security guy and a linux guy. So I study little by little but there is so much to just the aspects of IT that I want.

SteveO86

As long as your learning I'd say your doing ok.

Certificates are nice to have and acquire but try not to get consumed by them.

When I first past my CCNA, I didn't take another certification test for another 2 years (maybe a little longer) but I kept learning new things (depending on what my job demanded of me), then I started looking toward certificates again.

Now I'm not saying do not set a goal to get a certificate but just that the certificate is not everything. (I used an awful lot of negatives in there I hope this comes out the way I want).

Trust me you will want to buckle down and tackle one subject at a time. Whether it be WCNA or GPEN (or anything else)

Bl8ckr0uter

Yea learning is a must. 2 years, I pretty much have gone 8 months without a cert. mostly because of work and me being lazy.

Bl8ckr0uter

Got an offer pending paperwork and my background check. Should start in a few weeks (if everything goes ok).

millworx

Congrats man, was that the Engineering job for that VAR/Wireless ISP? If so welcome to engineering!

ipchain

Congrats! So, when are you buying us all lunch?

Bl8ckr0uter

phoeneous wrote: »

For what job? I've lost track somewhere.

millworx wrote: »

Congrats man, was that the Engineering job for that VAR/Wireless ISP? If so welcome to engineering!

That's the one. I was told it is going to be Wireless/Firewall/RS/Design/Security/Troubleshooting intensive and they are trying to beef up their network team with someone security conscious (get some WIDS/HIDS/NIDS going) so I am pretty happy. Now as long as they don't find out about my wild past lol

I am excited. A nice pay bump and some cool toys. Projected start date is in a few weeks so I am going to reread network warrior and try to knock out the WCNA before I start. I also need to do some labbing with ipsec vpns and start studying wireless. WCNA, CCDA, CCNA:W and/or CWNA will be immediate future with CCNP/CCIP/CCNP:S being on deck. Since they won't someone to be that security guy as well some SANS are in my mind but I am not to worried about that yet. My real goal is to further my understanding of network and networks down to the packet level and have rfc level knowledge of networking and security. And to get scrilla

ipchain wrote: »

Congrats! So, when are you buying us all lunch?

Well if you were local...

*lies. My past is super vanilla

shednik

Bl8ckr0uter wrote: »

WCNA, CCDA, CCNA:W and/or CWNA will be immediate future with CCNP/CCIP/CCNP:S being on deck. Since they won't someone to be that security guy as well some SANS are in my mind but I am not to worried about that yet. My real goal is to further my understanding of network and networks down to the packet level and have rfc level knowledge of networking and security. And to get scrilla

Unless the ask you for it I would just dive in to your new position, you may be too busy to even want to think about technology when you get home. Enjoy your life a little too

Bl8ckr0uter

shednik wrote: »

Unless the ask you for it I would just dive in to your new position, you may be too busy to even want to think about technology when you get home. Enjoy your life a little too

You are probably right. I want to get WCNA for me.They did sort of ask for CCNA:Wireless so I might pick that up as well. I am going to dive in hardcore. Especially since I need to learn ASA (apparently lots of things changed from 6.3 to 8.0) lol.

jahsoul

Congrats bruh!!! *edap* All I can say is hit the ground running man.

NOC-Ninja

Congrats. You made it! how much percentage of a bump did you get?

Goodluck on the enterprise wireless. Its amazing if you understand, design and implemented enterprise wireless.

Bl8ckr0uter

jahsoul wrote: »

Congrats bruh!!! *edap* All I can say is hit the ground running man.

Thanks a lot I hope to do so.

NOC-Ninja wrote: »

Congrats. You made it! how much percentage of a bump did you get?

Like 30% before taxes. Which is going to suck come tax time.

NOC-Ninja wrote: »

Goodluck on the enterprise wireless. Its amazing if you understand, design and implemented enterprise wireless.

Yea. From a person who has both CWNA and CCNA:W which do you think has had more value for you (directly and indirectly)?

SteveO86

Congrats man! Sounds like a lot of good technology!

RobertKaucher

Bl8ckr0uter wrote: »

Thanks a lot I hope to do so.

Like 30% before taxes. Which is going to suck come tax time.

Yea. From a person who has both CWNA and CCNA:W which do you think has had more value for you (directly and indirectly)?

This is excellent news. Two of my favorite people here are getting new jobs that are taking them to the next level professionally and a third is just a step away from his MCSE Security. Excellent.

So, should I change my name to V8nilaSw1tch to celebrate?

Bl8ckr0uter

RobertKaucher wrote: »

This is excellent news. Two of my favorite people here are getting new jobs that are taking them to the next level professionally and a third is just a step away from his MCSE Security. Excellent.

So, should I change my name to V8nilaSw1tch to celebrate?

LOL!!!!!

Hey when are we going to do the next ohio area meet up?

NOC-Ninja

Bl8ckr0uter wrote: »

Thanks a lot I hope to do so.

Like 30% before taxes. Which is going to suck come tax time.

Yea. From a person who has both CWNA and CCNA:W which do you think has had more value for you (directly and indirectly)?

congrats 30% is good. Im sure your expenses and tax are cheap due to your location.

It seems that that they want you to pretty much deal with RS, Security and Servers. They should pay you more.

Anyhow, I think CWNA will help you if you dont deal with Cisco WLC, WCS and AP's. CWNA gives a good explanation of the science behind wireless. It will also help you troubleshoot. Always think out of the box.

CCNA-W will help you if you will deal with Cisco wireless devices.

The thing about wireless is you need to understand the whole picture.
AP WLC WCS Authentication/Encryption and integration to their PC. are they going to be in public internet or private connection?

Goodluck

Bl8ckr0uter

NOC-Ninja wrote: »

congrats 30% is good. Im sure your expenses and tax are cheap due to your location.

It seems that that they want you to pretty much deal with RS, Security and Servers. They should pay you more.

Anyhow, I think CWNA will help you if you dont deal with Cisco WLC, WCS and AP's. CWNA gives a good explanation of the science behind wireless. It will also help you troubleshoot. Always think out of the box.

CCNA-W will help you if you will deal with Cisco wireless devices.

The thing about wireless is you need to understand the whole picture.
AP WLC WCS Authentication/Encryption and integration to their PC. are they going to be in public internet or private connection?

Goodluck

It is a Cisco shop so there will be cisco APs and such. I think I will probably pick it up. How much do you deal with radius?

mikej412

Bl8ckr0uter wrote: »

Got an offer pending paperwork and my background check.

Congratulations!!

NOC-Ninja

Bl8ckr0uter wrote: »

It is a Cisco shop so there will be cisco APs and such. I think I will probably pick it up. How much do you deal with radius?

Its already set up. We usually admin it.

Bl8ckr0uter

mikej412 wrote: »

Congratulations!!

Thanks!

NOC-Ninja wrote: »

Its already set up. We usually admin it.

My only real experience with Radius is IAS and my freeradius failure lol.

NOC-Ninja

Bl8ckr0uter wrote: »

Thanks!

My only real experience with Radius is IAS and my freeradius failure lol.

lol
are you going to set up a RADIUS server for them? Maybe they already have it.

Bl8ckr0uter

NOC-Ninja wrote: »

lol
are you going to set up a RADIUS server for them? Maybe they already have it.

Naw. These guys actually built their own radius implementation.

It was kind of funny, during the interview they asked "How much experience do you have with radius" and I said "just a little with IAS and FreeRADIUS" and they said "Oh well we built our own implementation". I sat there like wtf. But yea that is pretty cool.

NOC-Ninja

Bl8ckr0uter wrote: »

Naw. These guys actually built their own radius implementation.

It was kind of funny, during the interview they asked "How much experience do you have with radius" and I said "just a little with IAS and FreeRADIUS" and they said "Oh well we built our own implementation". I sat there like wtf. But yea that is pretty cool.

thats good. I have a co worker that built a RADIUS server for our enterprise wireless. He's very technical. I would give him all my certs for his brain. lol

TesseracT

What, they created their own radius server from scratch? Map props for that, but doesn't it seem a bit unnecessary? I wonder what they gain from it they can't get from pre-existing solutions?

But then again we use RSA at my work and you know how well they've been going lately

Bl8ckr0uter

TesseracT wrote: »

What, they created their own radius server from scratch? Map props for that, but doesn't it seem a bit unnecessary? I wonder what they gain from it they can't get from pre-existing solutions?

But then again we use RSA at my work and you know how well they've been going lately

From what they said there was a speed issue. Radius is extremely important to the business and other solutions weren't fast enough.

nicklauscombs

glad to hear you got the offer! congrats.

NOC-Ninja

Does the radius reside in VM?
If it is then 99 % its a VM problem. Lol damn those VM admins lol

Bl8ckr0uter

nicklauscombs wrote: »

glad to hear you got the offer! congrats.

Thanks!

NOC-Ninja wrote: »

Does the radius reside in VM?
If it is then 99 % its a VM problem. Lol damn those VM admins lol

Nope lol not quite.

Hey did you use the official CCNA:W book or did you use the Todd Lammel book?

SteveO86

Bl8ckr0uter wrote: »

did you use the official CCNA:W book or did you use the Todd Lammel book?

I had used the Official CCNA: W book when I was studying for the CCNA:W

The WLC Config guides also offer a great of source of knowledge for dealing with the actual WLC, and are definitely worth a look at.

NOC-Ninja

Bl8ckr0uter wrote: »

Thanks!

Nope lol not quite.

Hey did you use the official CCNA:W book or did you use the Todd Lammel book?

i used the official but i think their the same. Todd has a better review in amazon