Compare cert salaries and plan your next career move
rwmidl wrote: » One thing I've always done when taking a Microsoft test is I always mark the profile "novice" and "no experience/very little experience". They only time I didn't do that was on the 70-680 (Win 7) and I failed it the first time. The next time I took at (along with 70-640 and the prior Win2K MCSE tests) I marked with novice and 0 experience. Coincidence?
erpadmin wrote: » This is the one time where I will be neutral on this issue...there are those who say it's a bunch of crap and that the survey has nothing to do with the exam. All I know is when I started following the recommended guidelines for the MS exams, I have not failed as of today. So I'll just chalk it up to superstition.
Nobylspoon wrote: » You'll get it next time! Keep us posted on your studies. Are you doing 70-642 before 70-640? I keep hearing different opinions about this order and I have been trying to decide which one to start with. All of my Server time is from past labs (took a Server '03 class in community college), I only manage Solaris servers where I work.
demonfurbie wrote: » im tring the 642 before the 640 i read all the objectives for both and it looks like the 640 has alot of dns in it so i thought the dns stuff from the 642 would help on the 640 and the net+ stuff would help me on the 642 ... but thats just me
Hypntick wrote: » I'm pretty confused. I purchased the self-test from Kaplan yesterday as this was a suggested resource by the course mentor. Did a quick 20 question practice, 90%. The course mentor states if you can hit 95% then you're good for the real test. I'm now wondering where I went wrong. Going to try and shoot for the retest next weekend, really want to get this one out of the way so I can get on to the 70-640.
jmasterj206 wrote: » Same here. Going for my 3rd attempt in a week or two. People were getting very high scores on this one in the past. I am starting wonder if M$ looked at the results and decided to make it tougher. I have talked to Jason Jia a few times recently and we are not alone.
atorven wrote: » Good luck. Do you guys really think the surveys make a difference in the questions you get/don't get?
veritas_libertas wrote: » Tomorrow is my second attempt. I'm getting tired of skimming this book, with that in mind I plan to survive this beating
veritas_libertas wrote: » Okay, now I'm irritated. I didn't pass the exam even though I was certain I would. I rescheduled the exam for later this month this you have to push it back by at least fourteen days when you fail twice. I'm taking the weekend off to relax and it's back to the books Monday. The WGU semester ends on the 30th, and I need to get this class out of the way.
jmasterj206 wrote: » Don't feel bad veritas. You can join Demonfurbie and I. I have failed it 3 times so far. The material just doesn't cover what M$ is looking for. I guess after all those high scores over the last few years M$ decided to make it nearly impossible.
erpadmin wrote: » Are you guys using some sort of lab? Doing stuff hands on makes a lot of this stick. Between the 2K8 R2 servers at work and the one at home with Hyper-V (before that was Oracle's Virtual Box), the configuration made these exams bearable. Hands on is key, guys! I really feel bad to hear you guys are failing and wish I could do something.
Compare salaries for top cybersecurity certifications. Free download for TechExams community.