Compare cert salaries and plan your next career move
ptilsen wrote: » First, I'll address the more important concern of infosec experience for CISSP. If you have been doing Systems administration, with a part of your duties including managing accounts, group membership, & GPOs in AD, this generally falls under the Access Control domain, as I understand it. This means you do have experience. I have never worked in a purely infosec role, but I intend to sit for the CISSP in 2013 or 2014, based on hitting five years of systems administration. Regarding ITT, I have a lot to say. As someone who has been gainfully employed in this field for the better part of seven years, I can tell you without a doubt that my $38,000 AAS in Computer Network Systems from ITT Technical Institute is next to worthless. There is only a very limited set of jobs that is fulfills an actual requirement for. As far as the actual education, I had a couple of great adjuncts from whom I learned a lot. My Economics & Math teacher was the best I've ever had, and I had an excellent Cisco teacher (forget what they call the class, but it's basically ICND1 in disguise) who was a CISSP, CCNP, MCSE with 20+ years in the field. He really taught me some of what I was missing in networking and helped mentor me. Most of the rest of my instructors were either: A. Less knowledgeable about the subjects they taught than I was (and am) B. Not good at teaching C. Didn't really care The curriculum for most classes was also pretty bad. I mean, in 2010 they were still teaching a class that was meant to correlate to 70-293, years after the 70-64x series of exams was released. The curricula were almost entirely based off of certification exams (Net+, Linux+, A+, 70-270, 70-290, 291, 293, ICND1, ICND2), but there was no actual direction to get those certifications, and most of the classes would not have prepared anyone for these exams any more than self-study would. The only positive aspect of this is that ITT lets you test out of these classes, and the tests are actually easier than the certs IMO (I tested out of four classes). Getting past the extremely diverse quality of the instructors and curricula, the fact of the matter is that a four-year degree from ITT is almost worthless. Again, it fulfills a "requirement" for some job and is probably seen as better than a two-year degree or no degree, in most cases. If you have certifications, skill, experience, and a good resume I am pretty much just as likely to hire you without that ITT degree. So you'll still have about the same shot and about the same job but without the $80K in debt. Even if you make $10K a year less without the degree, it would still make more sense to go to a real school for 1/4 the price and take twice as long. Saying you take eight years instead of four, you're talking about $20K instead of $80K for a loss of only $40K in salary. That example is ridiculous, of course, since the ITT degree won't make you worth $10K more and a degree from a better, cheaper school won't take twice as long. Anyway, to end my ranting, the point here is that an $20K+-a-year degree from ITT is never going to be effective RoI. Even if the education were better, there are other options available for less money. Even if you still go to another nationally accredited, for-profit school with a poor reputation, at least it won't cost $80K. Most of them cost half that or less.
Compare salaries for top cybersecurity certifications. Free download for TechExams community.