Options
Why you need to make sure your Wifi access point is secure
If not somebody will access it, make threats and cause a SWAT team to bring the media along for a raid on your house lol.
SWAT team throws flashbangs, raids wrong home due to open WiFi network | Ars Technica
As the local police chief admitted later to the Evansville Courier & Press, the process is really just “designed to distract." (SWAT does not need to wait for a response.)Officers break the screen door and a window, tossing a flashbang into the house—which you can see explode in the video. A second flashbang gets tossed in for good measure a moment later. SWAT enters the house.On the news that night, the reporter ends his piece by talking about how this is "an investigation that hits home for many of these brave officers."But the family in the home was released without any charges as police realized their mistake.
Turns out the home had an open WiFi router, and the threats had been made by someone outside the house. Whoops.So the cops did some more investigation and decided that the threats had come from a house on the same street. This time, apparently recognizing they had gone a little nuts on the first raid, the police department didn't send a SWAT team at all. Despite believing that they now had the right location and that a threat-making bomber lurked within, they just sent officers up to the door."We did surveillance on the house, we knew that there were little kids there, so we decided we weren't going to use the SWAT team," the police chief told the paper after the second raid. "We did have one officer with a ram to hit the door in case they refused to open the door. That didn't happen, so we didn't need to use it."Their target appears to be a teenager who admits to the paper that he has a "smart mouth," dislikes the cops, and owns a smartphone—but who denies using it to make the threats.
SWAT team throws flashbangs, raids wrong home due to open WiFi network | Ars Technica
threatening violence against local police. They then sent an entire SWAT unit to execute a search warrant on a local house, one in which the front door was open and an 18-year old woman sat inside watching TV.The cops brought along TV cameras, inviting a local reporter to film the glorious operation. In the resulting video, you can watch the SWAT team, decked out in black bulletproof vests and helmets and carrying window and door smashers, creep slowly up to the house. At some point, they apparently "knock" and announce their presence—though not with the goal of getting anyone to come to the door.Thelong-standing,heavilydocumentedmilitarizationofevensmall-townAmericanpoliceforceswas always going to create problems when it met anonymous Internet threats. And so it has, again—this time in Evansville, Indiana, where officers acted on some
As the local police chief admitted later to the Evansville Courier & Press, the process is really just “designed to distract." (SWAT does not need to wait for a response.)Officers break the screen door and a window, tossing a flashbang into the house—which you can see explode in the video. A second flashbang gets tossed in for good measure a moment later. SWAT enters the house.On the news that night, the reporter ends his piece by talking about how this is "an investigation that hits home for many of these brave officers."But the family in the home was released without any charges as police realized their mistake.
Turns out the home had an open WiFi router, and the threats had been made by someone outside the house. Whoops.So the cops did some more investigation and decided that the threats had come from a house on the same street. This time, apparently recognizing they had gone a little nuts on the first raid, the police department didn't send a SWAT team at all. Despite believing that they now had the right location and that a threat-making bomber lurked within, they just sent officers up to the door."We did surveillance on the house, we knew that there were little kids there, so we decided we weren't going to use the SWAT team," the police chief told the paper after the second raid. "We did have one officer with a ram to hit the door in case they refused to open the door. That didn't happen, so we didn't need to use it."Their target appears to be a teenager who admits to the paper that he has a "smart mouth," dislikes the cops, and owns a smartphone—but who denies using it to make the threats.
Comments
-
Options
Roguetadhg
Member Posts: 2,489 ■■■■■■■■□□
Too bad the young woman wasn't watching G4TV's COPS.In order to succeed, your desire for success should be greater than your fear of failure.
TE Threads: How to study for the CCENT/CCNA, Introduction to Cisco Exams