Compare cert salaries and plan your next career move
N2IT wrote: » Check out this reviewSamsung Galaxy SIII review | Phone Reviews | TechRadar Excellent battery life (yeah right, nice lie)!
N2IT wrote: » I don't understand how you all are getting good battery life. I have asked several people and they all say their battery life is terrible. Do you have some extended battery or some power saving app installed?
N2IT wrote: » Have you ever owned an iPhone? Just wondering what you are comparing this phone against?
N2IT wrote: » Have either of you tried the Iphone 5 yet? I've used my friends and played around with it and the phone is awesome. It fits your hand nicely and the download speed off of LTE is great. I also like the fact the phone has been built with aluminum and not glass on the back. No need for a case anymore.
HTC America Settles FTC Charges It Failed to Secure Millions of Mobile Devices Shipped to ConsumersCompany Required to Patch Vulnerabilities on Smartphones and Tablets Mobile device manufacturer HTC America has agreed to settle Federal Trade Commission charges that the company failed to take reasonable steps to secure the software it developed for its smartphones and tablet computers, introducing security flaws that placed sensitive information about millions of consumers at risk. The settlement requires HTC America to develop and release software patches to fix vulnerabilities found in millions of HTC devices. In addition, the settlement requires HTC America to establish a comprehensive security program designed to address security risks during the development of HTC devices and to undergo independent security assessments every other year for the next 20 years. HTC America, Inc., a leading mobile device manufacturer in the United States, develops and manufactures mobile devices based on the Android, Windows Mobile, and Windows Phone operating systems. HTC America has customized the software on these devices in order to differentiate itself from competitors and to comply with the requirements of mobile network operators.
Until at least November 2011, respondent engaged in a number of practices that, takentogether, failed to employ reasonable and appropriate security in the design and customization of the software on its mobile devices. Among other things, respondent: (a) failed to implement an adequate program to assess the security of products it shipped to consumers; (b) failed to implement adequate privacy and security guidance or training for its engineering staff; (c) failed to conduct assessments, audits, reviews, or tests to identify potential security vulnerabilities in its mobile devices; (d) failed to follow wellknown and commonly-accepted secure programming practices, including secure practices that were expressly described in the operating system’s guides for manufacturers and developers, which would have ensured that applications only had access to users’ information with their consent; and (e) failed to implement a process for receiving and addressing security vulnerability reports from third-party researchers, academics or other members of the public, thereby delaying its opportunity to correct discovered vulnerabilities or respond to reported incidents.
As a result of its failures described in Paragraph 7, HTC introduced numerous securityvulnerabilities in the process of customizing its mobile devices. Once in place, HTC failed to detect and mitigate these vulnerabilities, which, if exploited, provide third-party applications with unauthorized access to sensitive information and sensitive device functionality. The following examples in paragraphs 9 to 15 serve to illustrate the consequences of HTC’s failure to employ reasonable and appropriate security in the design and customization of the software on its mobile devices. PERMISSION RE-DELEGATION 9. HTC undermined the Android operating system’s permission-based security model in its devices by introducing numerous “permission re-delegation” vulnerabilities through its custom, pre-installed applications. Permission re-delegation occurs when one application 3 that has permission to access sensitive information or sensitive device functionality provides another application that has not been given the same level of permission with access to that information or functionality. For example, under the Android operating system’s security framework, a third-party application must receive the user’s permission to access the device’s microphone, since the ability to record audio is considered
it_consultant wrote: » My experience with iPhone to Android switchers is that they spend too much time comparing it to their iPhone and not enough time actually learning how the heck the thing works. I am not saying that is what N2 did, it has just been my experience.
wd40 wrote: » A co worker has too many issues with his Galaxy Note II, only because his phone is rooted. He was "the" Apple/iphone guy, even with the issues he is having with the note he is not switching back to iphone soon. The point is, only root your Galaxy if you have to.
Compare salaries for top cybersecurity certifications. Free download for TechExams community.