Randy_Randerson said: Sorry I cannot help you Kiyori. However, my question is how/why you're willing to challenge a test that will cost you well over $1k for, yet $110 for a practice exam is too much? Also, I see they appear to have moved to a hands-on testing scenario based on the 100-150 questions you may see. So just studying the books is not going to be fully beneficial now. You can certainly try to flood any InfoSec forums and see if someone is willing to donate a practice exam to you.
MrsWilliams said: Sir,Where did you gather the information that is based upon those four words? MrsWilliams, if you go to the GIAC site: https://www.giac.org/certification/certified-incident-handler-gcih , you'll see that they show 100-150 questions. That is usually an indicator since GXPN and GCIA both have the same thing. Also, I Beta tested the environment for this exact test for the hands-on portion last summer. So I know it is coming eventually.
MrsWilliams said: Sir,Where did you gather the information that is based upon those four words?
FluffyBunny said: and now are adding hands-on testingPersonally, I'm quite happy with this development. I've always been amazed at "The Allmighty SANS(!!!)" resorting to mere multiple-choice, open book exams.
johndoee said: People can say the CISSP is the Almighty certification to have in the cyber security field. Actually, I just did a search in indeed.com with no city, state, or zip code listed. The more popular certifications GSEC, GCIH, and GPEN don't even have half the results as the CISSP certification. Yet, the CISSP is multiple choice...
Blucodex said: I can validate GCIH has hands on questions. I took the exam in January.
TechGromit said: Blucodex said: I can validate GCIH has hands on questions. I took the exam in January. Not sure by you mean by hands on, my the last exam I had, you were shown an example of some malware output using different tools and had to answer questions about that malware sample, instead of simple memorization of the books.