SteveLavoie said: I totally agree that GIAC exam are expensive... but that game need big pocket I am not GCIH... but I am preparing for GPEN (exam in 2 weeks) so most subject are similar. How well were you doing at your practice test? What was your weaks subjects? Did you rely mostly on your index? Were you rushed because you were too much using your index... 200 page.. it is a very big index. I am preparing to be able to answer everything from memory as if it wasnt an open book exam. I don't expect to use my books or index more than a few time for some quick fact check). It is more time-consuming but it will last longer.
E Double U said: What were your scores on the two practice exams as well as the real exam?
charismaticx said: There shouldn’t be that much of a difference honestly. Especially if you retest within a few weeks. I would honestly review your weak areas and review the books again. How did your index do during the practice exams and the real exam. If there was entries missing then go back and work on the index. The index helps reinforce what you’ve see in the books.
iBrokeIT said: Hello and welcome to community.You talked exclusively about your index as if it were your golden ticket to passing the GCIH. That mentality is the problem. If you have to look up more than 20% of the questions then you don't know the material well enough and aren't ready for the exam. At 200 pages you just made another book for yourself instead of a quick reference guide. Cap your index to 20 pages at most.Now, start over by reading the books start to finish and do the labs as you encounter them. You need to completely understand every section and lab before moving on. Do that twice. You need to spend more time focusing on the material and time less on your index. That would be my approach to GIAC exams which I'm only 8-0 on passing.
SecretUser said: I'm not sure if we're allowed to share our index with others, but a 200 page index is overkill in my opinion. I am on my second pass of SEC504 and my index is less than 50 pages.
After the first practice test I completely revamped my index to add what I missed from the first practice test and different variations of the words to find them multiple ways. Example would be: Netcat Port Scanning and Port Scanning Netcat. My thought was that I would hopefully find it either under the "P" or "N".
SecretUser said: After the first practice test I completely revamped my index to add what I missed from the first practice test and different variations of the words to find them multiple ways. Example would be: Netcat Port Scanning and Port Scanning Netcat. My thought was that I would hopefully find it either under the "P" or "N". I had this problem when creating my index for the GSEC because it was the first time I had to create an index for a SANS cert. I would advise against it as it becomes too confusing trying to remember the different ways in which you indexed something. If your index uses descriptions, just put Port Scanning in the description for Netcat and underline it so its easy to find. I hope that this makes sense, I'd give you an example if I could. lol. Did you create your index in excel or word with a tool like Voltaire?
SteveLavoie said: Sorry I dont want to offend you, but I would have focused on learning the stuff instead to be a master "indexer".
cyberguypr said: Did i just read that right? 200 pages? Just NO! I realize all indexes are different but this just doesn't work. After 4 certs I still stand by my indexes: https://community.infosecinstitute.com/discussion/98047/passed-gcih. The GCIH index was only 13 pages. Either you know the material and need a little refresher here or there, or you don't know it. The index sharing discussion comes up in the SANS Advisory Board every now and then. Almost everyone agrees that sharing indexes does NOT violate anything or is considered cheating. That is assuming it's a real index and not full copies of SANS course content. Some of us argue that sharing indexes does not have much value because building the index is part of the learning experience. If I share my index and someone fails, they could easily blame me. Heck no!
SecretUser said: Right off the bat I can tell you that you need to work on what you put under the "Term" field of your index. Do you really need to put "Network Stuff ping" as a term? Why not just put ping? Like I said above, it can become confusing trying to categorize your terms like this because some terms don't fit neatly into a category. Also, do you really need a new row for each step of a DNS attack? Why not just have a term for the DNS attack, and in the description put see page for example/steps? I will try to provide a snippet of my index when I get a chance.What version of the course do you have? If we have the same version, I wouldn't mind being your study partner! I am just about to finish my second pass of the books.
charismaticx said: I don’t think the length of the index matters as long as you know how to use it and it’s separated properly with alphabetical dividers. I also tab out the books for quick reference. It really comes down to if you know the material.
chapnoodle said: E Double U said: What were your scores on the two practice exams as well as the real exam? Practice tests were 68% and 67%. The real exam was 67%. I had roughly 50 minutes left when I go to the hands on.
scasc said: realized the key thing is to really understand the material properly.