nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

Choosing the proper route:

mmartinez85

Can the IP address 172.16.10.1 accept a route of 172.16.0.0/22?

The 172.16.0.0/22 range of addresses that the above IP would fit into is:
172.16.8.1 - 172.16.11.254

Why is the practice question saying that is not a correct route?

Find more posts tagged with

SAVE $250 on Your CISCO Boot Camp — Use Code "EXAM26"

Exclusively for TechExams members for Infosec Boot Camps starting before April 30, 2026

View CISCO Boot Camps

Comments

Forsaken_GA

Need to see the entire question, something might be in the context. 172.16.0.0 comprises all ip's between 172.16.0.1 to 172.16.3.254, so the router should be able to accept that route advertisement from a neighbor, but we can't tell you why the question says it's wrong, or if the question itself is wrong without seeing the question

Heero

Forsaken_GA wrote: »

Need to see the entire question, something might be in the context. 172.16.0.0 comprises all ip's between 172.16.0.1 to 172.16.3.254, so the router should be able to accept that route advertisement from a neighbor, but we can't tell you why the question says it's wrong, or if the question itself is wrong without seeing the question

172.16.10.1 does not fall in that range

Forsaken_GA

Heero wrote: »

172.16.10.1 does not fall in that range

I understand that. Note that I said 'the router should be able to accept that route advertisement from a neighbor'

But he's apparently got a question that's telling him otherwise. That's why I want to see the entire question.

hexem

Yeh, the router could be running a classful routing protocol, such as RIPv1, need to see the Q.