Exclusively for TechExams members for Infosec Boot Camps starting before April 30, 2026
Excellent1 wrote: » ... In any case, good luck on the re-take and don't shell out any money you don't need to.
erpadmin wrote: » So one way or the other, I don't have to shell out money OR have to hand in a FAIL report to WGU.
jmasterj206 wrote: » Well finally got through QLT1. The graders were averaging 5 days per submission. Only 5 more classes left! Not that I am counting or anything. I am hoping to get through Tech Writing and the Capstone this term, but I don't know if I have enough time. Then I would have the 3 MS classes left for next term.
Lemonade727 wrote: » I'm kind of stumped on creating a linear equation for the scenario I chose in task 5. Was kind of busy at work yesterday so I couldn't focus on it completely so I'll be trying again tonight, but I feel like i may need to rework my scenario completely or pick another one to where I can get these equations sorted out.
myedjo24 wrote: » The equation part is pretty easy if you don't try and over complicate things. For example, if you just did a monthly fee for each company and then a start up fee for each company all you'd have to put is like y=(price of monthly fee)x+(start up fee). Where Y is the total cost and x is the amount of months.
nhpr wrote: » The BOV1 exam doesn't seem to correlate all that well with the practice exams they give you. Luckily, I'm good (enough) at guessing. Had I known, I would have found an additional source to study for the exam besides just the one WGU gives.
drew726 wrote: » what was missing?
themagicone wrote: » I have no idea what I'm going to write for my tech/cap. I have no experience working in IT, I've never done any security work, and I really have nothing to go on. The papers are designed around working on a project at a job or something of the sorts but I have nothing.
jmasterj206 wrote: » I saw one of the capstone's was 70+ pages. There is no way I could make it that long. I hate writing with a passion. 20 pages it will be!
drew726 wrote: » Writing for me is a lot easier than tests. I can bullshit my way through a 20 page paper in two nights.
never2late wrote: » My experience with Cindy wasn't as negative, more neutral. The class material is confusing at best. I was never sure what they were looking for as far as the programming went, especially the GUT1 class. I tried to explain this to her and the response was always "read the resources and do all the practice programs". The structure they wanted was nonsensical, meaning that it was never clearly explained why you would code this particular way. I struggled through it and passed, but this class convinced me that programming is not my cup of tea. When I uploaded my code I fully expected it returned with errors but it passed on the first try. Good luck.
never2late wrote: » My experience with Cindy wasn't as negative, more neutral. The class material is confusing at best. I was never sure what they were looking for as far as the programming went, especially the GUT1 class. I tried to explain this to her and the response was always "read the resources and do all the practice programs". . . .
apr911 wrote: » Sorry to hear about your experience with GUT1 and GTT1. Dont let the experience spoil you to programming though. I can tell you that the 2 courses need a serious revamp and better explanation/more freedom to program design if they want it to be successful. As someone with a fair amount of programming experience, I can say that the WGU courses are probably as bad as it gets. Very rarely will you find yourself with a task like the ones for WGU, vague project definition with specific requirements. Youll find most programs that may be requested of you fit into 1 of 2 categories: 1. The programmer - Requests program ABC and wants it to function using XYZ 2. The non-programmer - Request program ABC and doesnt care how it get there Bottom line is the program will almost always be well defined. WGU leaves the program very vague and then wants you to demonstrate functions/methods that have no business being in a legitimate program which just adds to the confusion.
never2late wrote: » I still question the necessity of programming for a security related degree, especially something as intense as these two classes.
nhpr wrote: » I was actually thinking that there's nowhere near enough in this program. For example, a buffer overflow vulnerability is enemy #1 for security. However, they don't go into the basics of the stack, EIP, etc. so someone whose only educational background is WGU would have no idea how they work or how to keep them out of their code.
Nobylspoon wrote: » I just started at WGU today and have already completed EWB. I have my first call with the mentor this afternoon. I emailed him to ask if we could also discuss my AAV during today's call. Hopefully I don't have to wait until the second call for this.
Pishof wrote: » It was on the first call for me and I can't see it being handled any other way. That's where you add your course load after EWB.
Nobylspoon wrote: » Looks like I'm not as fortunate. Last week my mentor requested I select two times from his list for calls. I selected the 1st and the 3rd. I just found out that he only has me scheduled for a call on the 3rd and he said that call needs to remain just an introductory call and that my AAV would have to wait for another time. So it looks like I have to twiddle my thumbs until sometime next week before he will let me set up my AAV...
Exclusively for TechExam members. Applies to boot camps starting before April 30, 2026.