OctalDump wrote: » There seems to have been a race to the bottom with online training courses. Maybe it has something to do with people not being willing to pony up the money for quality.
Simrid wrote: » I find that INE by far is the best video training provider from my experience. I really can't fault them, informative, organised, clear and concise.
Iristheangel wrote: » I'm going to assume you didn't see the BM videos where he fat fingers something or forgets to configure something and goes on 30-60 minute tangents where he's trying to troubleshoot his own config. There's hours of those videos on the CCIE R&S and CCIE DC video libraries
DPG wrote: » I actually like the imperfect videos that have you screaming at your monitor "you did it wrong! you forgot something!"
Simrid wrote: » Ouch, yeah I haven't seen them. The security (NA) and R&S (NA+NP) seem to be solid compared to competitors. Who's your preferred video training provider?
Iristheangel wrote: » I will say this though: INE probably could rock it and kick the arse of the competition if they just developed VODs to be specific VODs, not try to turn bootcamps into VODs to save money. Heck, it would probably be improved a GREAT deal if they just edited the videos - I would have had a LOT of hours of my life back on the CCIE DC track if this had happened.
Iristheangel wrote: » I used to like JP and Jason Lunde's videos over at IPX. I know both are making their own videos now... I heard Jeff Rensink is good too and he started his own wireless company but I'm not going down the wireless track probably ever. I've seen some good videos off of Fastlane, TwistedIT, Lumoscloud, CBT Nuggets, Pluralsight, Labminutes, etc that are awesome as well. I think the difference is that they made the videos specifically for VOD and would either edit the messups out or would re-shoot because the content is delivered specifically as a VOD. With INE, I think the big problem is that they typically have a "two birds, one stone" approach of just recording live bootcamps with all the issues you might have live or taking videos they bought off of Youtube content providers (Rob Riker) and putting them in their entirety up as content without ANY edits. I also get irked at some of the technical inaccuracies but I've only noticed them so far in the security track since I didn't go far down the R&S path yet i.e. watching the Introduction to Firepower videos, "Command and Conquer servers" or "When Cisco says AMP, they really are just talking about their sandboxing technology." I guess it kinda also it hard to watch because for 5 or 6 hours of video, the majority of that is on a slide and maybe 1 hour of it is in the actual console of Firepower...
Iristheangel wrote: » I'm not going down the wireless track probably ever.