gojira1019 wrote: » Yeah I know that it doesn't need to be just good practice. But wait I am confused again. If there were 510 hosts wouldn't the last octet go up to that then? I am sorry if these are dumb questions.
gojira1019 wrote: » May I ask what you mean by that little pitfall? I think I know what you mean, but I would like to make sure.
gojira1019 wrote: » Okay, got it. Thank you for that, that helped a lot. You definitely just made that lightning bulb go of in my head. Also just for a reminder the reason you minus 2 host addresses is because you have the .1 dedicated the gateway and the .255 dedicated to the broadcast address correct?
gojira1019 wrote: » Hello, I am new to the networking world, and I figured I would ask on here in hopes one of you could help me out with something. I have been through some Cisco courses, but the one thing that confuses me beyond belief is the idea of private addresses and subnetting. I have been looking over our network documentation and I am seeing that we have subnets with 192.168.22.0/24, 192.168.22/23, 192.168.20.24, etc. I guess I am just confused as to how these subnets were created and what they were created from? I just need some help understanding the basics of how to subnet within private address blocks. In my classes the only subnetting I have really done is VLSM with changing a 192.160.10.0/24 network into something like a /25, /26. My teachers did not do a real good job teaching the concept of private addresses, and I am wondering if anyone could offer some guidance?