beads wrote: » CRISC is excellent if your headed down the CRO (Chief Risk Officer) role or something similarly esoteric. Otherwise its a bit of an unknown to most people. Not that its a bad exam by any means but has a very small targeted audience for now. Oh wait, I can tell you its really pretty basic mathematically speaking as risk is always calculated as today, not modeled or projecting into the future. So from an actual business standpoint I don't find the methodology to be particularly flexible or useful but introductory. Add threat modeling and longer term risk management and it would be seriously useful. Add some 'R' and 'S' programming and all the better. - b/eads
mnashe wrote: » thanks everyone. Maybe I'll put the CRISC on the back burner. I see a lot of risk analyst positions, so that's what made me think of it
Ertaz wrote: » I did the CISSP in the spring and the CASP in the summer. I agree with the earlier poster about doing the CISSP first. In my opinion the CASP is a much more technical test.
trueshrewkmc wrote: » so I sat CISSP in October 2016. Passed 'em both. (Not endorsed yet so cannot add CISSP to profile.)