alias454 wrote: » @CptFalcon, you know you can directly correlate your linkedin name with the resume you posted. Just saying . I would agree that the reason sounds lame. IMHO it should have only warranted a talking to and only to let you know that in the future the expectation is to get approval before patching system x and system y. Maybe there is more to the story but it doesn't matter, you are where you are and the only thing you can do is keep trying. Don't give up because something will turn up. This "hot" IT market is only hot if you are in a role with hard to find skills and even then you have to work for what you get. Good luck to you.
scaredoftests wrote: » Where do you live? I see on your resume that you have had contract jobs, that did not last long. Some companies understand that, some do not and feel that you job hop and won't be around long. I have been through that, so I am glad that you did put contract on the positions. I live in the DC metro area, so there are companies that understand. Yes, put your certs and skills at the end of your resume.
anhtran35 wrote: » DC/VA is always hiring for GOVT contracts. Are you willing to relocate?
scaredoftests wrote: » Or just say the contract ended.
DatabaseHead wrote: » Sorry to hear about your recent situation that is really unfortunate. Someone had to fall on the sword and you were appointed for this honorable act. One thing I noticed on your resume is all your job efforts are REALLY short. I see you call them out with contractor, but for some companies that won't make a difference. In fact a few months ago on public radio they had a VP of HR from (GE) I believe could of be another, but basically said if your last position wasn't for at least 2 - 3 years you were omitted from the system immediately. So you may be challenged with some of that as well. Like others have mentioned, I would most certainly consider getting the CCNA or MCSE (depending what direction you want to go). This could help pull you through into an interview. The CompTIA's never really seem to get people very far in regards to the higher level positions, such as SA or NA. Good luck!
scaredoftests wrote: » However, @Databasehead, you live in an area like the DC Metro area. Contracts have been known to be changed or modified. Hence, it could be a 6 month contract. I have run into that issue the last 2 jobs I had. Now, I have been in a position close to 2 years.
revbox wrote: » Did you guys have a change management policy? If you did, this would be evidence at your appeals hearing. Even though my workplace has an understood "maintenance window" on Wednesday nights and Saturday/Sunday nights, we still have to file change requests for any type of server maintenance that would take it offline. Change requests go through our change control board in which any impacted business owners must approve along with the technology manager and change manager. These are fully documented with exactly what work is to be performed plus roll back plans. Sounds like your manager decided to scapegoat. A server went offline that pissed off a client who griped to manager for their line of business who probably then escalated to the upper line of management who then went to your manager. Rather than admit to giving you verbal permission, it was easier to scapegoat you (if you have access to any e-mail correspondence that you had any sort of permission, that would be handy also). In an environment with established change controls and a process, I'd say then termination would probably be deserved, but if there was no official policy and you guys just kind of YOLO'ed patching, then this is pretty dirty. In hindsight, you know what to look for in the future as far as asking about change documentation and approvals along with putting everything in writing for CYA purposes. Good luck with your job hunt.
DatabaseHead wrote: » @SoT Completely agree that contracts can end for both sides, my reply to that is: 1. The OP has never held a job for over a year according to their resume. This will surely hurt the OP in finding another position, that is just a fact. Even if they were all short termed efforts by design. 2. SOME companies don't care the rhyme or reason, if you can't prove you are capable of lasting years in a position or multiple positions you are deemed too big of a risk to hire for SOME companies. They would rather pass and go with a candidate who has experience that is contiguous and blocked together. I am not trying to discourage the OP, I am merely trying to rationalize why they MIGHT be having a hard time finding a new job. I went through this about 5 years ago. I had a 3 month contract (by design) and a 8 month contract and it killed me for ~2 years. I finally repaired my reputation by joining on a start up for ~ 14 months, they went under and I hopped onto a fortune 20. Best of luck to the OP.
xxxkaliboyxxx wrote: » Maybe someone can chime in, but I would put your certs and skills towards the bottom and have your experience one of the first things that a hiring manager and HR would see.
Cardboard wrote: » NO WAY!!! My certs come right after my objective and before any of my IT job experience, I worked hard for them and want everyone to know!
EANx wrote: » When I see a resume with certs at the top, I assume they don't have equivalent-level experience and typically don't bother reading farther unless I have just a few responses.