jamesleecoleman wrote: » There's nothing wrong with spending a few years in helpdesk before getting into a field that you want to get into.
p@r0tuXus wrote: » I appreciate your post and agree with most of your points. Your last sentence got my eyebrow raised. Are you saying 3 years at the helpdesk is adequate experience for moving into security? Maybe if one works 3 years in a NOC, moving to a SOC might not be a stretch. But 3 years at the helpdesk with certifications earned and drive would be enough to convince you a person is ready? Let me say, I'm not taking a position on this but I'm curious. Most people on these forums (understandably) seem to share the opinion that admin experience is required. Preferred I can see, but I've never been sold on the "required" notion. I don't work directly in security, though tasks I perform daily revolve around it. Take that for what it's worth.
JoJoCal19 wrote: » How will you know how to secure networks if you've never worked with them? How will you know how to secure endpoints if you've never worked with desktops or servers? Same with databases, applications, etc, etc.
Infosec85 wrote: » I have certifications in networking, servers and security, including Linux. I've been around computers from the 90s I also have formal education within Software Dev so I'm no noob but I don't claim to be a pro either.
Infosec85 wrote: » So are you saying that someone without helpdesk experience could move directly into a security role?
Infosec85 wrote: » Also someone new to I.T with no experience and say A+ and Network+ can land a helpdesk job so what's the difference?
p@r0tuXus wrote: » Someone without helpdesk experience explicitly, no doubt. There are network engineers, system admins, developers and managers that go the security route all the time. Going into security without helpdesk experience or any other experience, i highly doubt it... for all of the reasons mentioned by most of the good people here. My question was more to Jamesleecoleman: are you saying 3 yrs helpdesk experience is enough to transition to security? It doesn't seem like it'd be a popular opinion and I was curious why they may have thought that was good enough, if that's what they were saying. I wasn't trying to take a position on it because I'm not sure i have the experience in security to make that call. I would imagine it would depend on education, certifications, the interview of the person and the position they were going for - before I could answer that. So more like a case-by-case basis. I've known people at the helpdesk or in a NOC that were there for more than 3 years that I wouldn't trust to handle anything security related.
BlackBeret wrote: » CEH, Sec+, and a security clearance will get you an "entry" level security position in a LOT of .gov contractor companies for infosec. Just ignore the requirements when applying, most of those companies are so desperate for warm bodies they'll give you the test **** if you only have a clearance.
BlackBeret wrote: » CEH, Sec+, and a security clearance will get you an "entry" level security position in a LOT of .gov contractor companies for infosec. Just ignore the requirements when applying, most of those companies are so desperate for warm bodies they'll give you the test **** if you only have a clearance. On the same note, join the Army, get a clearance, sent to some high speed training, then sent to 5-6 SANS courses (just sit in class, tests are optional but paid for if you want them), then be an "expert".Cyber Operations Specialist (17C) | goarmy.com