stryder144 wrote: » I would say that we can eliminate C and D. A is a good practice. For answer B, I don't like that they put Potential in it. B is what I would do, along with A. So, long answer short, B.
TechGuru80 wrote: » No...it says in conjunction with a termination. You wouldn't remove just some of their access would you? You limit access at all times during employment, you wouldn't want to give a heads up of terminating somebody, and as soon as they are terminated they need to be walked out of the facility. The answer is A.
infosec123 wrote: » I have yet to see a person who was laid off or fired go through an exit interview, and I have seen hundreds of people laid off/fired in my career. My only thoughts to B is what if the person doesnt have any access to begin with? Either way its a bad question.
shoey wrote: » little late for this but figured I'd add my two cents. hope it helps. When looking at A and B I read it as: A. Should perform an exit interview B. Should limit computer access Both answers (as written above) would be acceptable - however since answer B includes "potential" it seems like they are trying to lead you to select A.