DatabaseHead wrote: » Get it down to two pages mini. Interesting you went to UMASS and got your degree in accounting. What happened? Not a big fan of the speciality section. Id like to see your resume with your heading straight into experience.
EANx wrote: » Who is your target? In addition to the aforementioned length, your margins are narrow and you have way too many bullets. A job from 13 years ago gets a summary of 2-3 sentences, not 12 bullets. Your military entries have too many TLAs and ETLAs you need to spend more effort spelling out acronyms so that the non-govvie understands what you did. Given your variety of job duties, I recommend a summary at the top showing how it's not random jumping and ties it all together.
NavyMooseCCNA wrote: » I am looking to get into IT Security. The other alternative is to get into networking and work to transition into IT security from that.
cyberguypr wrote: » Another thing to keep in mind is that each resume must be unique and tailored to the specific position you are applying for. You will most likely want to add or remove things based on the job posting.
NavyMooseCCNA wrote: » Personally, I have never bought into this because I need to hear more on the why....
According to a report from The Ladders, ATS software ranks your candidacy based on how specifically your résumé matches keywords and phrases in a job description. Some software even looks for how uniquely the work experiences you listed match the job requirements.
shochan wrote: » Rezscore.com I have used this before & pretty cool...see how yours is graded. I would submit everything listed on your resume except your personal info. That is your personal preference though.
cyberguypr wrote: » One of the main reasons: Applicant Tracking Systems. Employers are trying to automatically match key experiences and skill sets with what the candidates have to offer. Your boilerplate resume that doesn't hit their specific points will reduce your chances. Example: You will get people saying "oh, don't waste your time with automated systems, just spend time on companies that treat you like a real human". If you are willing to lose a job for not bowing down to the ATS, that's fine. Just understand that it will reduce the universe of possibilities by an order of magnitude. Another aspect is that many people in IT have a wide variety of skill sets and experience that does not necessarily translate to their new job. It would be counterproductive for many to include stuff that is not directly related to the position you are pursuing. Besides taking a lot of space on the page, it may be seen as complete fluff. There's no one way to win this game. I like to keep the odds in my favor so I do as much as I can to maximize my chances. Some people don't see much value in customizing resumes and still get jobs. It's hard work to tailor your resume to specific roles, but many will agree that it increases the likelihood you will be called for an interview.
NavyMooseCCNA wrote: » Personally, I loathe the automated HR systems. You need to get past those damn systems before a human being even sees your resume. I'm sure there are many quality people whose resumes never see the light of day because of the automated system.
cyberguypr wrote: » Good list, although usually no one cares about GPA and 10 bullets is way too much.
cyberguypr wrote: » Was it an entry level thing that you applied for?
NetworkNewb wrote: » If you go for your Masters it will be easier to get into programs. So at least you have that going for you...
NavyMooseCCNA wrote: » I had a 3.56 GPA when I finished my MBA and a 3.42 when I finished my BS.