JasminLandry wrote: » The only positive thing that happened to me because of the SSCP is that I'll be featured in ISC²'s blog as an SSCP spotlight within the next few days . Maybe I got interviews because of it but I'm not too sure because no one really every asked me about it. .
beads wrote: » At 125,000 certified members and climbing there is really no reason at this point to become CISSP.
JasminLandry wrote: » The only positive thing that happened to me because of the SSCP is that I'll be featured in ISC²'s blog as an SSCP spotlight within the next few days . Maybe I got interviews because of it but I'm not too sure because no one really every asked me about it. So like NetworkNewb said, if the jobs you're looking for are not asking for it, I'd skip it and go at something else instead.
beads wrote: » You probably have enough background in IT to merit the jump to the CISSP. Its the automotive mechanics and GAP employees that show up with the CISSP and no IT experience that get immediately discounted/rejected. At 125,000 certified members and climbing there is really no reason at this point to become CISSP. - b/eads
SteveLavoie wrote: » How were you choosed?
triplea wrote: » From my own point of view I actually found this to be the hardest exam Ive ever taken.I already have the sec+ but thought that this cert and the people who write the cert endorsed me more in the security world.The Daril book isn’t enough to get you through the exam anyway and is quite light reading.Although it’s a technical exam I still think its still too much theory rather than needing the experience. That said, it doesn't explain exactly how to implement something eg NAT but you know what it does and you know what to google. Maybe that the level its aimed at and shows you know where to look.
ITSec14 wrote: » I skipped it. Didn't really see value in it so I'm just going straight for the CISSP now.
NetworkNewb wrote: » Except that since everyone and their mom now has the cert, companies might think of it as an easy requirement and expect people to have. Kinda like how the A+ is to entry level support positions. You don't need it, but you probably should have it.
beads wrote: » The auto mechanic with ZERO practical experience and CISSP didn't make it through the team interview so my comments were moot before I could pipe in.
mikey88 wrote: » The Auto mechanic with zero security experience will not qualify for CISSP unless the experience was somehow falsified.
unrealskillz06 wrote: » For what its worth, I passed the SSCP exam. Now I have to go thru the endorsement process. The test was pretty much what I expected. The sheer amount of questions is what gets you. I couldn't imagine doing the CISSP with 250 questions. I may or may not try the "Big One" in a few months depending on how motivated I feel about it. lol. Thanks everyone for their input.
SteveLavoie wrote: » If you have all those certification, I dont think that you will get something from getting SSCP. SSCP is Sec+ level or a bit higher. Also remember that if you have those certification, it remove 1 year to the 5 year requirement for CISSP. So unless you are very new into IT, I think you should look at how you can apply for CISSP or Associate of CISSP as you are near the requirement. I doubt you have only 2 years of IT experience.
yoba222 wrote: » Well if you get really creative, installing car alarms sort of deals with physical security. And maybe all that CAN-bus hardening to stretch even farther . . .