NetworkingStudent wrote: » I did find a job at a MSP that I really enjoyed. How do I bounce back from this? It's hard because I had a lot of recuiters that wanted to work with me before taking this job. Also, I did turn down a temp job for this one.
thomas_ wrote: » They lost a client and things slowed down. It’s pretty obvious why they’re letting you go even though they decided to frame it as an issue with you when it’s really an issue with the company.
techfiend wrote: » I'm realizing MN isn't compensating IT as well as they used to. I also know an unusually high amount of unemployed IT workers and not many openings. Supply surpassing demand?I wouldn't put the position on your resume. It sounds like a potential financial issue and you were the cheapest to let go. I'd use their reason as fuel to show the next employer you are better than they thought.
UncleB wrote: » From what you describe it sounds like 1 of 2 things happened here: 1 - they no longer need the headcount and since you are easy to get rid of and they have least investment in you, then you are first to go. 2 - you didn't gel with the team and they used an excuse to let you go - maybe they had someone else in mind. The company should have set you objectives in the first few days that would be scheduled for 30, 60 and 90 day targets then they have 2 weekly meetings to review your progress against these and make sure you are getting the support needed to achieve them. If you don't reach them because of a basic lack of competency then they have grounds to let you go - and it should highlight to you where your failings were to help you develop in future. Unfortunately most managers overcommit themselves and don't make time to manage their staff, leading to situations like yours. Either they made a poor hire (the managers fault) or you were not given clear enough objectives, training and support (again down to the manager to organise) so you can see where the blame is poining here. Make sure you get a letter from HR that clearly states the reasons for the termination as a short spell in a company is often a red flag to future employers and it is good to have this as a way to mitigate it. It's happened to me (well I found the manager of a public sector company was embezzling company funds and was let go before I could report him - but amazing what an anonymous tip to the press can yield, especially with proof) and you just have to mark it up to experience and get even better at working to be a part of the team when you join the next place and ask for objectives and reviews to both prove yourself and cover your back. Don't worry that you were at fault too much and don't hold a grudge against the company - it gets unhealthy and is simply not worth the energy. Look forward to making yourself better and pity the fools who lost you as part of the company - it is their loss.
NetworkingStudent wrote: » Thank you for your comment! I think it was number one. They did say they would give me a good reference and they would hire me again if I had more training. I got a letter saying employee separation. Verbally they told me the reasons, however on the paper it says" didn't meet expectations" They did change management roles. One of the guys on our team became a lead and took over all of the reviews and such. I really wish they would have came to me and said hey you're not meeting x or y requirement....how can we help you?
mbarrett wrote: » They lost a client, and they needed a reason to let people go. It sounds like you were the new guy, and did not have enough time to find your niche on the team. Nothing wrong with that - it's just business. I'm sorry to hear it didn't end well, hopefully something else turns up soon. I wouldn't overthink it too much. The fact that they pulled you off the Help Desk and tried to train you for something else is not your fault. it sounds like it might be a smaller company so they probably have limited resources, and they were probably looking for something to keep you on. It's good that you had other promising leads before you tried the MSP job, so you know that you are already marketable. That does not change, because one company was not able to perform well enough in their own business to be able to keep all their employees. It's also good that you found something you liked while you were there - that means it wasn't a waste of time, you might be able to find another job where you are able to do these things.
NetworkingStudent wrote: » Do I mention this job to recruiters? If not I might have a employment gap.
scaredoftests wrote: » Sounds like a screwed up company. Learn from this and move on
DatabaseHead wrote: » They said they see struggling. ( they were vague when they said this) They mentioned how I set up my supervisors computer. I used to many cords for the monitor. However, I made sure his computer worked before I left.Hard to say, usually it's a combination of things from my experience. They probably weren't impressed with you AND what made them act on this was the loss client. Most likely if the client would of stayed on with the MSP they would of overlooked your skills, at least that is my previous experience. Then they mentioned that the guy that trained me for two days, saw me struggling. No one said they see me struggling. to my face.Right or wrong it sounds like the senior guy wasn't impressed and went to management. It sounds like he has their ear and they listened to hjim Infact what is really weird is we had a service meeting a week ago and my superviosr said it's slow, and they are not letting me go.Welcome to IT. I've seen public awards to people in a conference setting, two months later they are let go. Talk about one extreme to the other. Well at the end they said I'm a nice person, and feel free to apply again when I have more experience.That's very important they recognized you as a nice person, at the end of the day that is the most important even if it doesn't feel like it now. Also, they said they don't have time to train me. What was weird is I was let go right after the project was finished.Another not so subtle hint that you weren't meeting their expectations. I am currently going through something like this now. I started off doing great, and had trouble finishing a large SQL in a short period of time. I suggested we get another set of eyes on it and now I am getting the silent treatment. Oh well I'll keep working until something happens or nothing happens. Either way good luck in your search!
NetworkingStudent wrote: » used to many cords for the monitor
cyberguypr wrote: » Am I the only one wondering what this means? OP, don't overthink it. This stuff happens and life goes on.
Panther wrote: » I realized you're the same OP on the other thread, about choosing the library work or the msp. Sorry this happened. I'm in the job market too, so I feel for you. Would you be able to share what you would do differently, in hindsight? If you want.
blatini wrote: » MSPs are ruthless man (I work for one now). You need to walk in there having a really good foundation and willingness to get your hands dirty in everything and anything. Sorry it happened. You should write down everything you did and were asked to do when you were there. Research it all and see what you could have done different. Get an understanding of what was said versus what was expected and you'll be better off next time