stephens316 wrote: » Just great i got screwed in October by the price going up and now i am getting screwed again by the test format.
H-bomb wrote: » According to Luke Ahmed from the cissp study FB group. ********************************************************* NO CHANGES TO THE CISSP EXAM FORMAT ********************************************************* Just spoke to someone at ISC2 after authenticating my member ID and name. They have confirmed there will be NO CHANGES TO THE CISSP EXAM regarding the computerized adaptive testing posted by CyberVista. Not in December, not in April, not a year from now. They have run up the website that is spreading this message to their management, who will deal with it. Please carry on your CISSP studies as normal.
Thanks for your inquiry, and sorry for the delay in responding. At the (ISC)² Security Congress member Town Hall last month, our CEO discussed introducing CAT for the CISSP exam. We don’t have a timeline to share just yet, but more information will be forthcoming.
cyberguypr wrote: » I have no cat in this fight
Falcon56 wrote: » We have different answers all throughout this thread. I take the exam December 11th. Is the test changing or not?
cyberguypr wrote: » I have no cat in this fight but I am inclined to believe the CyberVista gentleman. His story would be easily verifiable by finding one of the other 1999 who attended the event. Also consider that the first line ISC2 support peeps are most likely told nothing until changes go live or a press release goes out.
shimasensei wrote: » The price increase now this, major changes for CISSP this year. Going to be similar to Cisco's exams, you can't flag and go back to a question. Interesting to see how this will work for a 6 hour exam.
SteveLavoie wrote: » Is it only me, or time does not seem to be an issue for me. All 250 question practice test that I am did took me between 1.5 to not even 2 hours with result in the 78-80%. So even, if I use double time, I am far from the 6h time limit. I will see by myself on Nov 16th.
justdavey wrote: » Bonne Chance!