EnderWiggin wrote: » "Don't trust anyone over 30!"
--chris-- wrote: » He had a rough patch, showed up habitually late by 5 minutes. They worked with him, get it straightened out and after a year he was moved into a dev spot with more money, responsibility and freedom.
LeBroke wrote: » Wow I wouldn't even work in a place where that's an issue... And neither would a lot of good engineers, a lot of whom, let's admit it, tend to be extremely disorganized and happy go lucky.
--chris-- wrote: » To each their own. Rules be rules, matey. We all know them and sign up for the same thing.
LeBroke wrote: » There's rules that matter (i.e. "follow change request process"), and rules that don't matter. Being 5 minutes late is a rule that doesn't matter, especially if your job is pretty flexible overall in the "get X done by end of sprint" sense.
gkca wrote: » Don't get me wrong, but which rules matter defined by those who sign your cheque
LordQarlyn wrote: » Yep! And almost every place I worked at cared about punctuality. I used to be one of those "who cares if someone is a few minutes late!!" type people. But as a manager now, I do see a correlation between those who are habitually late even if only a few minutes and having sloppy work.