JoJoCal19 wrote: » I actually have been wanting to get a CS degree, partly for learning and understanding CS concepts, partly to get into GT's OMSCS program. I understand one can get into that program by taking a couple of math or coding/CS courses then transferring in, but you're really at a disadvantage by not having the whole CS undergrad degree. So I looked at B&M CS degrees but you have to take so much BS Calc and Physics courses either to get in, or as part of the program. I'm not doing another 3-4 years part time to get BSCS. The entry level algorithms, discrete structures, and other CS concepts is what I really need. When I heard about this and the PDF of the degree plan leaked, I was happy. So I am thinking of submitting my degrees to have it reviewed and see how many classes I can get taken off, and doing this before going for the GT OMSCS.
josephandre wrote: » have you looked at Oregon State's post bacc? or any of the new coursera masters offerings (ASU for ~ 15k) etc?
josephandre wrote: » To me it sounds like you just want to cut corners on earning the degree, but are billing it as wanting to learn. If you like it though, I love it.
josephandre wrote: » i get it. as far as who cares about the depth... i mean, someone who wants to learn CS?
DoubleNNs wrote: » I think what josephandre was saying (and I agree with him) is that he's confused because you could just learn the CS fundamentals on your own time for free. And then start the MSCS. The disconnect is because you already have multiple degrees and you have your goal set on the MCSC and not being tied down by artificial limitations. Even w/ WGU, the curriculum itself can be viewed as an artificial limiter, regardless of whether it's a lighter limit than another degree program. Positive reps to josephandre, because I understand his confusion and to contrast any negatives he's gotten. Edit: But just like josephandre, I'm not trying to talk you out of or discourage your pursuit JoJo. This IS a forum about tech exams. And we all see the merit in obtaining (say for example) a CCNA vs just reading Network Warriors and thinking you have the knowledge of a network admin.
JoJoCal19 wrote: » josephandre's argument wasn't for doing a whole BSCS, but rather why do the WGU vs a B&M (ASU or OSU to be specific). Then he started merging in a new argument of why not just learn CS fundamentals, which you're mentioning too. I'll answer both as clearly as possible. But yes, essentially the Network Warrior vs CCNA logic is a part of it. Why do a degree instead of learn CS fundamentals: 1. With Georgia Tech's OMSCS (and really every other MSCS I've seen) they require a BSCS. In lieu of that, GT requires an arbitrary number of CS courses to be completed to go along with your non-CS BS. It's arbitrary because it depends upon a multiple of factors including what coursework you did during your BS (to include any CS classes, math classes), and your current work experience. My current resume (combo of work experience and education) make me an extremely weak candidate. Therefore I guesstimate I would need to do somewhere between 4-6 courses to make me an attractive candidate. 2. As I stated above, over the years I've done a TON of research into MSCS degrees. I've read syllabi, course descriptions, read reviews and talked to students of, and sampled course material for CS courses at B&M universities. CS is not something easy that just anyone can pick up. It's really difficult stuff and I've read many horror stories of people either un-prepared for the MS level, or who still couldn't cut it at the MS level after getting a BSCS. I know myself, and learning a few CS fundamentals isn't going to cut it. I want to learn all of the undergrad level CS stuff to make sure I'm not wasting time and money at the MS level. So now that we've established the why of doing something like a full BSCS, why WGU over any other B&M, read above as I've laid it out very well, but to summarize here: 1. Cost. $28k for OSU post-bacc. $6k-9k for 2-3 terms at WGU (probably 2 terms). 2. Time. 3+ years for B&M due to antiquated model. 12-18 months for WGU (again, probably 12 months). 3. It ties into #2, but flexibility is key. Why the hell should I be forced to sit through a long, drawn out class for 20 weeks when I can do the class in 2-4 weeks (depending on difficulty and how well I grasp the material)? As well, finishing my third B&M degree now, I'm sick and tired of flexing my schedule and life to fit due dates. My WGU MSISA was a breath of fresh air in that regard. I have times where I can dedicate 6+ hours in one go on material. Times where I have birthdays, vacations, holidays and would rather not deal with school work. Flexibility is key. 4. It's yet to be seen until reviews come in, but WGUs method will probably make the material more accessible and present it in an easier way to grasp, unlike what I've seen from reviews from CS students at B&Ms. Additionally, there is more flexibility to WGUs courses with the availability of tons of free outside resources.
josephandre wrote: » sidenote, i'm only invested because i'm in a similar boat. i've already been rejected from OMSCS, haven't been able to find a local/affordable/convenient option to take the courses they recommended before reapplying, and other options i've looked at/mentioned are just too expensive for me. OMSCS seems really cool and affordable, but the level of effort and expenses, and time i'd have to commit to just have another shot at potential entrance have kinda cooled my interest. This program looks like it will be pretty good and i'm thrilled their offering it. Just don't know if i want a second bachelors or not. decisions decisions