DatabaseHead wrote: » Thanks for the feedback. This is for a data scientist position within the company. It's going to be a tough one I already know. Tonight I am relaxing and getting prepared and for the next 7 days or so I am going to be nose to the grind stone. Thanks LeBroke.
DatabaseHead wrote: » they said they need at least 3 weeks to get the lab and interview set up for me.
cyberguypr wrote: » Plot twist: lab runs on a 486 DX2-66 4MB RAM and 540 MB HD machine so they need to be very selective on what they put there.
networker050184 wrote: » I interviewed with them once for an automation role. Pretty standard stuff. Speak to recruiter, a couple phone screens and an interactive coding interview. It was my first and only coding interview and I bombed, but that was no fault of theirs and I thought they were very fair and helpful even though I was struggling with some of it.
EnderWiggin wrote: » Emphasize the fact that Facebook servers are owned by the company, and that they should be able to legally do whatever they want with the information on those servers. If people willingly write information to Facebook's hard drives, then that is implied consent to the data being given to whomever Facebook desires.
TechGromit wrote: » I don't know about this, there are various privacy laws the company must comply with, but I'm also puzzled why the public is making a big deal out of this, data mining is nothing new. It's been used to advertise and sell goods and services for years, why suddenly people feel there privacy has been violated makes no sense. It might be Trump related, many people do not like Trump, if they feel their information was used in some way that helped Trump get elected may be one of the reasons they are outraged.