Compare cert salaries and plan your next career move
Svoboda wrote: » Yep, May 14th for me too. I just submitted my case. Did they get back to you quickly?
EnderWiggin wrote: » That's pretty poor service on their part. You should ask for a refund.
Pseudonym wrote: » Anyone in this cohort had a SECOPS voucher yet?
Pseudonym wrote: » Yep. Within a few hours it was all sorted.
Svoboda wrote: » I opened a case this morning and got a response with a voucher code. Unfortunately, the code was invalid. So now I'm stuck in limbo again. Ugh.
thedudeabides wrote: » I completed the SECOPS course Tuesday of last week, but never received a voucher. What exactly are you guys saying to support in your tickets? This is what they told me:Voucher processing is typically conducted on Tuesday of each week. Voucher will be sent to the candidate within one week from course completion date. If you have any further questions, or require additional assistance, please click the link below to update your case.
Pseudonym wrote: » If you only finished last Tuesday, then you have to wait 7 days for a voucher as they stated in their reply. So you should get it tomorrow.
shochan wrote: » Well, I was just emailed by Cisco that I was disqualified from Cohort 7 due to being a contractor for gov't...SMH
relegated wrote: » Just passed with an 871, agreed that it was much more difficult than SECFND. I didn't feel confident but was pleased to see the congratulations at the end. Glad I am done with this cert, hope everyone else does well.
shochan wrote: » I actually was awarded the scholarship before I was a contractor for gov't though.No, it has to do with gift giving to gov't contractor/employees apparently. FuuuuuuuuuCISCO! I never liked their tests anyways.
fredlwal wrote: » So I start the Cohort 7 July 6, Anyone get the Cisco press book CCNA Cyber Ops SECFND #210-250 ?
Pseudonym wrote: » That sucks. Any news yet?[FONT=&]Passed SECOPS today with a 917. Harder than SECFND, which I'm glad about cause I don't want to walk out of the test centre feeling like I haven't achieved anything.[/FONT][FONT=&][/FONT][FONT=&]Bit worried as the test disconnected twice & my score is showing up as pending on the Pearson Vue site. Called them and they said it was successfully delivered so I'm hopefully just worried about nothing.[/FONT]
Svoboda wrote: » They finally responded yesterday evening 15 minutes after I received the automated voucher email. I'm scheduled for tomorrow night. Time to quickly refresh as I've forgotten a lot of the diamond model and Veris stuff already after looking through the outline.
Pseudonym wrote: » The diamond model isn't actually mentioned on the blueprint.https://regexone.com/
Pseudonym wrote: » I always find the exam blueprint is the most accurate reflection of an exam. Remember, the NIST documents & the VERIS schema are mentioned explicitly on the exam blueprint. The NIST documents aren't covered at all by the e-learning. They're quite a large part of the percentage measured on the blueprint as well. It's a good indication of how much of it will be on the exam.
Svoboda wrote: » I believe Section 5 is based on NIST. Cisco stated that you should be able to pass the tests with only the eLearning materials.
Pseudonym wrote: » I've just had a look at section 5, and I believe that section 5.3 in the e-learning maps to 5.4a of the exam blueprint (Which I actually missed. I thought that was referring to volatile data collection) I don't feel like the rest of 5.4 on the blueprint was adequately addressed. Feel free to correct me though. I think when they say that it's enough to pass, that doesn't equate to covering all of the objectives. In my experience, exam vendors expect you to do extra research on top of the official reading materials. Although that's moreso true with Microsoft. There's also things like 3.3 on the exam blueprint and numerous other examples. For me, I'd rather not risk it.
Compare salaries for top cybersecurity certifications. Free download for TechExams community.