paul78 wrote: » I'm exploring switching to Nexpose for a client from Tenable. The reason being that I'm not a fan of storing vulnerability information at a third-party. For me personally, I'm not a fan of using Tenable because they compete with their customers when it comes to penetration testing so that's a bit of a turn-off. That's probably why Qualys has a big market among PCI QSAs. .
MitM wrote: » I'm using Tenable Security Center, it's an on-premise solution, for the most part.
MitM wrote: » What do you mean they compete with their customers? Tenable does pen testing?
paul78 wrote: » I did recall seeing that they offered penetration testing services through their professional services arm. Although, it may have been the koolaid that I drank from the Qualys sales person. I may have been mistaken in my statement since that doesn't seem to be true today.