dave330i wrote: » I'll play. Why should the customer pay for you to learn your sh*t? What assurance does the customer have that you built it correctly?
Z0sickx wrote: » Interesting thread, for those of you that accepted positions you weren't ready for..does that mean you were dealing with technology or processes you've never touch before OR were these positions where you had a background with the tool/or process and you were expanding hence "not ready"
DatabaseHead wrote: » I was just thinking of this thread. I was contacted by a corp recruiter and this is for a senior lead/manager role. At first I was apprehensive, but this thread inspired me to go forward. Thanks
NetworkNewb wrote: » Good luck!!
gespenstern wrote: » So, using jobs to trick yourself to advance is a) a dead end as it works only earlier in career b) ultimately, for the weak. Real overachievers do that under any conditions 24/7, no slacking off, no excuses, no self-deception!
thedudeabides wrote: » I don't know. By this logic, one is better off skipping around in school. Why go from grade 9 to 10 when you can challenge yourself going directly from 9 to 12? Why take Calculus 1, 2, and 3, when you can just jump into Calculus 4 and learn on the fly? The premise essentially says foundation is unimportant, just make a radical jump and see what happens. I'm not sure I agree with that.
UnixGuy wrote: » We're not saying jump from an IT job to a brain surgeon job, but jump up within the same field. i.e. jump from System admin to system engineer or architect, for example.
dave330i wrote: » That's just natural career progression, not uncomfortable challenge. An uncomfortable challenge would be a Sys Admin becoming an enterprise DBA or Exchange admin.
Jon_Cisco wrote: » Most people prefer to sit in their comfort zone.
UnixGuy wrote: » I've never accepted a job offer that I was ready for.