Compare cert salaries and plan your next career move
mikej412 wrote: » What's your configuration for the router with the NM-4A/S acting as the frame relay switch?
BroadcastStorm wrote: » Let me just try to clearly understand this, since I had it working with this configured. On the Frame-Relay Switch a "Frame-Relay Route" has to be configured on the serial interfaces. On the non Frame-Relay Switch "Frame-Relay Map IP" has to be configured for static DLCI mapping.Frame Switch: interface Serial1/0 no ip address encapsulation frame-relay clock rate 32000 frame-relay intf-type dce frame-relay route 102 interface Serial1/1 201 frame-relay route 103 interface Serial1/2 301 ! interface Serial1/1 no ip address encapsulation frame-relay clock rate 32000 frame-relay intf-type dce frame-relay route 201 interface Serial1/0 102 frame-relay route 203 interface Serial1/2 302 ! interface Serial1/2 no ip address encapsulation frame-relay clock rate 32000 frame-relay intf-type dce frame-relay route 301 interface Serial1/0 103 frame-relay route 302 interface Serial1/1 203 !Hub interface Serial0/0 ip address 172.23.24.2 255.255.255.0 encapsulation frame-relay no fair-queue frame-relay map ip 172.23.24.3 102 broadcast frame-relay map ip 172.23.24.4 103 broadcast no frame-relay inverse-arpSpoke 1 interface Serial0/0 ip address 172.23.24.3 255.255.255.0 encapsulation frame-relay no fair-queue frame-relay map ip 172.23.24.2 201 broadcast frame-relay map ip 172.23.24.4 301 broadcast no frame-relay inverse-arpSpoke 2 interface Serial0/0 ip address 172.23.24.4 255.255.255.0 encapsulation frame-relay frame-relay map ip 172.23.24.2 301 broadcast frame-relay map ip 172.23.24.3 302 broadcast no frame-relay inverse-arp
kryolla wrote: » your config looke good I would like at the command reference to get more familair with what your doing.
BroadcastStorm wrote: » Hey guys I am following Chris Bryant's video and I was at the RIP part testing if other RIP routers is receiving network broadcast, but it doesn't look like it's working, can someone please point me to the correct direction, my Frame Relay configuration is showned above.
BroadcastStorm wrote: » Where am I missing this broadcast command is it on the frame-relay switch the route won't accept a broadcast command, please advise thanks.
blackninja wrote: » Your config looks fine: are you able to ping through your FR network? If so have you turned Split Horizon off on R1? If not the RIP updates will not be to go back out of the serial to the other spoke.
BroadcastStorm wrote: » Everything is pingable, I am still new to split-horizon, but regardless if RIP is set to Router 2 or 3 Router 1 should receive something from one of the two Router 2/3 which is not able to.
BroadcastStorm wrote: » Weird dynamic behaviour on my frame relay I turned off inverse-arp but still gets the following mapping on the Hub. Serial0/0 (up): ip 0.0.0.0 dlci 103(0x67,0x1870) broadcast, CISCO, status defined, active Serial0/0 (up): ip 0.0.0.0 dlci 102(0x66,0x1860) broadcast, CISCO, status defined, active Serial0/0 (up): ip 172.23.24.2 dlci 102(0x66,0x1860), static, broadcast, CISCO, status defined, active Serial0/0 (up): ip 172.23.24.3 dlci 103(0x67,0x1870), static, broadcast, CISCO, status defined, active
BroadcastStorm wrote: » I turned off inverse-arp but still gets the following mapping on the Hub. Serial0/0 (up): ip 0.0.0.0 dlci 103(0x67,0x1870) broadcast, CISCO, status defined, active Serial0/0 (up): ip 0.0.0.0 dlci 102(0x66,0x1860) broadcast,
kryolla wrote: » What does split horizon do? It prevents a routing update from being sent back out the interface in which it arrived at, so since you have a full mesh just like an ethernet segment split horizon is enabled. So you need a hub and spoke to play with split horizon and no point to point sub-interfaces just set it up on the main interface or multipoint sub-interface. I dont think you understand the FR map statement. For ethernet you need to send a packet to an IP address that is local to your segment but it cant encapsulate it in an ethernet frame without a mac address. So the router will arp for the mac and now it can send a packet . For FR you have layer 2 address the DLCI via the LMI from FR switch but no IP address so inverse arp will resolve the DLCI to an IP address but ony for directly connected neighbor due to it being non-broadcast the hub cant forward broadcast between spokes. So now you know how to send traffic from spoke to hub but not spoke to spoke so you need a map statement which is a static statement saying to reach this OTHER IP address I have to use the same DLCI going to the hub and the hub will send it to the other spoke. Ping the hub and then the spoke and you will notice spoke to spoke will be twice as long to get the packet. Now you know that for spoke to spoke it comes into the hub and leaves out the same interface thus you need to disable split horizon manually or auto. FR map ip 1.1.11 101 broadcast Your FR switch config is a full mesh the route statement says I am receiving this dlci route it out this interface and this dlci so you have 2 route statement to reach 2 other routers, if you only have 3 routers then this is a full mesh, all 3 routers can talk to each other directly. Just because you have full mesh fr switch config you can modify the routers to only use certain DLCI and make them partial mesh or hub and spoke by map statements. If you were using inverse arp then it would be full mesh as you have the FR Switch setup as full mesh. frame-relay route 201 interface Serial1/0 102 frame-relay route 203 interface Serial1/2 302 Hope this helps yeah the 0.0.0.0 is part of the autoinstall process when the router does not have a start-up config, just save your config and reload like everyone has suggested.
Compare salaries for top cybersecurity certifications. Free download for TechExams community.