Hey all, haven't been around for a little bit - work, life, studies, ramblings. So anyway, was pretty down on myself for failing the CISM by 2 points last year. Note to self... Study will ya!
Last December I took the CISM with no studies trying to rely on solely experience and for what it's worth, I didn't do good - nope, I didn't pass, regardless if I failed by 2 points or 100 points. So I made it a point this year to take my time where necessary.
I've been swamped with Juniper equipment this year so CCIE studies have went out the door. Sooner or later I will take some of the JNxxx courses - after all they're free

however, I decided to allocate 120 hours study time to ISSEP, CISM and overall information assurance and DRM based studies (where I lacked on the CISM) then I aim on taking the CISM again in June.
For now though, going to go back and do some heavier pentesting studies. The goal for 3rd quarter 2010 (ready for insanity):
Technical
JNCIA, CEPT, CPTS, OPSA, OSCE (next step above the OSCP) 1-2nd quarter 2010
Management (2nd - 3rd)
CISM, *maybe* the CISSP, unsure don't care much for it
Odd-man-out
CISA, NSA-IEM/IAM
My question to all is... What do you do to study? Personally, I have little tolerance for most recommended books because I tend to find "real world" flaws in the content. Because I'm consistently working with security whether it's vuln-assessment, analysis, pentesting, managed svces (firewall, IPS, IDS configurations/management), it's hard for me to sit reading a book when I say: "uh yea but not in the real world!"
What are some recommended ways of UNLEARNING the processes and RE-LEARNING by the book - even when you know it may be incorrect? Anyone... BTW Keatron, if you by chance stumble on this, plan on procuring the InfoSecInstitute package (Pentest), working it out right now..