Compare cert salaries and plan your next career move
impelse wrote: » ...I create my flashcards suing Flashcards: The world's largest library of printable flash cards ...
snadam wrote: » for the most part I use "Royal's study method" . Its worked wonders. The only time I really didnt follow these guidelines, I failed
JockVSJock wrote: » Hmmm...This is an interesting thread, and its interesting because each of us learn differently, however there may not be much difference when it comes to it. I've been taking notes on how I study for the 70-270, and I'm finding that in order to pass certs, you got to do the following: -Read -Take notes from reading -Drill Questions and Review Reading -Labs Basically I'm trying to reverse engineer on how I learn. The reason for this is that I feel that I'm basically brute forcing on how I learn. I've been doing this for years, its not much fun and come to find out, I'm not alone when it comes to feeling like this. I recently found this blog called Study HacksStudy Hacks Basically this guy is reverse engineering on how to learn. I've been applying some of his stuff to my studying and starting to make better progress. For example, he has something called Quiz and Review. Instead of doing the typical Rote Review for your reading, you basically prepare your reading with Questions/Evidence/Conclusion and then you read it aloud, like you are teaching a class. If you can teach it back to your imaginary class, without looking at your notes, you can move on. Here is an example of it:The Single Most Important Study Strategy You Will Ever Hear | Student Help Forum This really has helped me, of course he says that you won't have to put much time into, I disagree. Your gonna have to put the time in order to get the results. I would be curious to see other Tech Exams folks look thru his stuff and see if they can get it to work for them and pick it apart.
Selfmade wrote: » Thank you for posting that as well. I DO find it helpful to know the material well enough to teach it. In my CCNA classes at the college I attend, I am often helping out others when we do the labs in class on the actual equipment. I'm positive that technique does, can, and will work because it's a self-fulfilling prophecy. If you know the material well enough to teach it at a high level, then you SHOULD be able to pass the exams on the material. I believe that being able to lecture or explain to others the material is the true test of how well you 1) learned the material 2) how much of your learning is of quality and 3) your ability to grasp the material and explain to others in your own words the concepts behind the material in an articulate and intelligent fashion, and thus being able to demostrate the material if the occasion demands it. I've had opportunities to teach others the things I've learned and I really do enjoy teaching, I would be willing to consider a part time teaching job at a college or university if I were able. I think more importantly than simply "learning" is that you have to actually like and enjoy the material, because it's a thousand times easier to learn if you feel like you are not only gaining knowledge, but you ENJOY the material you learn. That takes something that tests can't measure, which is passion. My teacher at the college doesn't teach with any passion at all, all he does is read the material off the online cirriculum word for word, which is something we can all do ourselves at home. He doesn't "teach" at all. That upsets me and I often spend my time during his "lectures" reading the material myself and taking notes. That is the best way to learn if you find yourself in a situation like that. That and hands on experience, you learn a lot better with hands on experience. Packet Tracer, Dynamips, real equipment, you'll need all that hands on experience to learn. It's great if you remember that command x goes with command y to do Z, but when you're out there in the real world, stuff DOES go wrong, hence the best complement to your learning is the ability to learn on the actual equipment and apply it in a real world environment. Sometimes you can challenge yourself by having someone else who knows as much or more than you do come in and screw everything to hell, and since he knows the answer, you can try to figure out how to make it whole again. That way you're tested in a real environment on how much you know and how well you can apply what you THINK you know. You might be humbled, or maybe you'll pass with flying colors, whatever happens at least you'd have a real test of your knowledge in a real world experience, and that will help you immeasurably later on. This is a great thread, I hope some moderator decides to sticky it, because with enough contributions, this thread could literally live untill the end of this forum's life and be useful for hundreds, if not thousands of members here.
GAngel wrote: » I start with alcohol and usually end with alcohol... I mix it with alot of book reading and labs.
dynamik wrote: » I have an attention span that can only be measured in nano-seconds (/baseketball), so practice exams and lab work are the best resources for me. I'd rather go through a thousand practice questions five at a time here or there than sit down and read a book. My mind wanders, and I don't soak anything up. I always use a book or two, but in terms of usefulness, they fall to the bottom. There have been a lot of good study threads; I'd encourage people to do some searching through the forums for similar topics. Astounding information is contained within (/fortune cookie).
Zartanasaurus wrote: » Pick up a CBT for the cert. Watch them all.
JockVSJock wrote: » I've noticed a number of people are doing this, I'm gonna have to add this into my toolbag of studying.
JrSysAdmin wrote: » I have a method that has worked for me but I'm not sure how long it will work for. Basically I will just pay to write a test, say February 28, and I won't let myself reschedule the test. Then I will do very light studying for the next two weeks, and then the weekend of the exam (I usually schedule them for Sundays), I will cram all night Friday, all day Saturday, and on Sunday until it's time to take the test. At this point I write the test and have passed it every time so far. However, I'm sure it won't keep up. For the CompTIA and Microsoft test this has been fine and I don't suspect that it will change. A big reason I'm able to do it for these tests is because I already know the subject matter very well and it's more or less just a review for me. However, in the near future I'm going to go after my PMP and RHCE and I know I won't be able to pass these tests using this method. How do you guys go about structuring your studying so as to stay on task? Short of taking classes at a local university I'm not sure how to setup such structure for myself over such a long period of time without slipping up. So with that said...how do you guys go about doing it? What works for you? Can't wait to see the responses. Thanks guys (and gals)!
Compare salaries for top cybersecurity certifications. Free download for TechExams community.