dynamik wrote: » When are you thinking about doing it? I'll be going that route before the end of the year and could provide better feedback in the near future. I'll also be using this: Amazon.com: Incident Response and Computer Forensics, Second Edition (0783254041295): Chris Prosise, Kevin Mandia, Matt Pepe: Books and the NIST IH/IR docs: http://csrc.nist.gov/publications/PubsSPs.html Here's another good thread that will give you some direction: The Ethical Hacker Network - Incident Handling - Resources, from start to finish You also get two practice exams when you sign up for a challenge, so that'll help you identify any weak areas that you can research further. Be sure to visit the 504 course page and view the day-by-day breakdowns for the course too.
TrainingDaze wrote: » If you have experience in the areas listed that GCIH covers and you feel confident that after reading Skoudis' book (and maybe another related book or two) that you can pass then I'd say go for it. It's not unheard of that people can just do self study for each individual topic covered in the coursework listings and pass. ...But if you're like me and don't have a lot of experience in all of the topics, and are not willing to bet $900 on yourself that you can pass the exam then maybe it would be prudent to take another look at being a facilitator. I've signed up for the work study program when sans comes to town in December and made 503 my first pick, with about 6 other choices right behind it. It's important to remember that many of these classes greatly overlap each other so if you end up having to facilitate for 560 or 503 then you will still spend a good amount of time covering topics relevant to GCIH (apparently there are actually people out there who only pursue one Giac cert so a lot of the courses share an overlap of information, but you wouldn't know it wandering this forum ).
docrice wrote: » As hinted earlier, SANS posts your score online so anyone can see how well you did. This is one of the reasons I didn't challenge the GSEC (although in retrospect, I could have). There's that certain awkward moment when someone checks the list and you have a just barely passing score. Hmm...
dynamik wrote: » Yep, you're just a GCIA and a gold paper/other GIAC cert away from being GSE-eligible. I think I will throw my personal finances to the wind and register for the GCIH. It is absolutely unacceptable that Paul is one up on me in SANS certs.Warning Veritas: This is a dangerous game to play Also, I just noticed Chris Mohan (occasionally posts on EH and has written some gold papers) threw in his hat for the GSE this year. I'm really curious to see how he does and what his experience is like. Show him some support; my comment is currently half the total comments 31 days to the GSE Exam | Security for a day
veritas_libertas wrote: » In what way, having you stalking me on boards like you do Paul?
Paul Boz wrote: » I got a 91 on the GSEC challenge with no books. It's truly an easy test. That being said, I probably wouldn't challenge the GCIH without materials because I don't really know of a good incident handling book that quite describes the process in the exact words and terms that the GCIH books do. Counterhack (and really any pentesting book) would be sufficient for the 5 days of pentesting, but the incident handling book is the thickest and has the least overlap with any other course. You could probably BS your way through the incident handling stuff but as someone else said, the scores are posted online so do so at your own risk.
veritas_libertas wrote: » Why not CCSP?