Hi Darril, I'm currently reading your book, and I think I found a couple mistakes. On page 432, there is a picture on the bottom. The hash of "The price is $75." is D9B93. Then on the other side, it says the hash of "The price is .75." is also D9B93. Shouldn't the second D9B93 be 56429? Then again at the top of 434 there looks to be the same mistakes. Shouldn't the second hash in this picture be whatever the encrypted hash of "The price is .75." So I'm not sure if this is a simple mistake, or if you were trying to show that even though the message changed, the hash sent didn't change. But I think that approach could confuse some people. You could always consider having a 3rd box. So on top is the message, next is the hash that was sent with the message, and then the 3rd box is the hash that the receiving computer calculated. Let me know what you think.
Hi, That is actually accurate. The point is that the sent message changed but the sent hash didn't change. However, since the hash is recalculated at the destination, it can be compared to the sent hash to show that the message lost integrity. The pictures (on both pages 432 and 434) are attempting to show what is sent, not what is calculated. Cryptography can be a complex topic, even for very experienced IT people since the details aren't touched or used very often, if at all. You might like to check out this youtube video:YouTube - Security+ Hashing HTH and good luck with your studies.
earweed wrote: » I tried finding Darrils erratra page but couldn't locate it to see if this was mentionned.
ajmatson wrote: » Ask and ye shall received CompTIA Security+ Get Certified Get Ahead Errata
