Book now with code EOY2025
Pash wrote: » Respect should be mutually exclusive. So if I do not receive it I don't give it back. Problem solved.
networker050184 wrote: » I don't know your exact situation, but having a second opinion on your suggestions or an extra set of eyes isn't abnormal. Everything we do is checked and double checked by peers and discussed among everyone. No one single person makes a decision (big decisions that is, small things are a different story). Sometimes you have to put your pride aside. Especially when someone shoots down your idea. At first I felt a little weird having everything I wrote up looked over and scrutinized with a fine tooth comb, but you just have to realize its for the best of the company. And a second opinion is never a bad thing. As far as management trusting the other guy more, thats just a fact of life. People feel more comfortable with someone they have more experience dealing with. Once you put in your time and build up that same comfort level things will change. Once you build that up they are sure to notice that you know what you are talking about and will value your opinion more. You may be the one getting brought in to give the second opinion. But I agree with the others, mutual respect is a must. Respect must be earned though.
Bl8ckr0uter wrote: » I agree with you. But sometimes (actually most times) I know he is doing it just to polish himself. He actually told me (at one point) that he wanted to do security (before they hired me) and then they hired me and how he is a security guy at heart. Now I am suppose to be this guy's JR but he tells me that he wants my role. The funny thing is that is exactly how he acts. Always second guessing me or questioning me on anything and everything. I think he does it just to piss me off. He reoccuring line is "Just in case you get hit by a bus or win the lottery" but apparently it doesn't go both ways. Like he'll want me to explain to him anything and everything about a particular project I did, how I did it and etc but he won't say anything about the virtual environment because it is "complicated". Or the storage environment because it is "complicated". Or how the hell he is rolling out those servers because it is "complicated". Or what he did to Exchange to allow IIS to relay mail because it is "complicated". BS is more like it.
Bl8ckr0uter wrote: » If it isn't their golden boy, its the developers. Prime example: They updated production code this morning while people were on the website. This is a dumbass thing to do as we usually go through change control or at least get a change window but they said "In my experience it is ok" and just did it. Yesterday I fixed a website problem after figuring out what dll a site needed registered and registered it in IIS. I then asked for a dll file map (which site buttons/objects points to which dlls) and their response was "That's not possible, just register them all". I then asked about all of these extra files they published that aren't called by the project and they said "don't worry about it". I am just highly annoyed right now.
RobertKaucher wrote: » So you are expected to be a security admin who simply rolls over to them and registers DLLs whose purpose the people who created refuse to disclose to you? It sounds like you are being actively prevented from performing your primary job function. Do you feel like you were hired so that when (not if) something goes wrong there is a person on whom blame can be placed? The big issue I see here is that your company has hired you into a position for which they have not made a commitment to back.
RTmarc wrote: » As long as that nice paycheck keeps finding its way into my bank account and I can work on my stuff without unnecessary interruptions I could not care less if every other employee respects me. People worry too much about what other people think.
Bl8ckr0uter wrote: » I agree with you. But sometimes (actually most times) I know he is doing it just to polish himself. He actually told me (at one point) that he wanted to do security (before they hired me) and then they hired me and how he is a security guy at heart. Now I am suppose to be this guy's JR but he tells me that he wants my role. The funny thing is that is exactly how he acts. Always second guessing me or questioning me on anything and everything. I think he does it just to piss me off. He reoccuring line is "Just in case you get hit by a bus or win the lottery" but apparently it doesn't go both ways. Like he'll want me to explain to him anything and everything about a particular project I did, how I did it and etc but he won't say anything about the virtual environment because it is "complicated". Or the storage environment because it is "complicated". Or how the hell he is rolling out those servers because it is "complicated". Or what he did to Exchange to allow IIS to relay mail because it is "complicated". BS is more like it. Honestly I have no problem with being the number 2 as I have said in the pass. I have no problem with being someone's JR but as a SR you are suppose to mentor and lead the JRs, not belittle and cockblock them. I just don't think that's how it should be.
it_consultant wrote: » I think this displays an almost scary lack of maturity. It is even more disturbing that people don't seem to recognize how dangerous this type of attitude is both personally and professionally. Even if you are right, if you don't approach professional issues with courtesy and respect (regardless of whether you received it in the first place) you will have issues. What really irks me about this is that it is this exact attitude from IT people that has caused our profession to lack credibility. I have to fix this perception at nearly every client I work with. I am not singling out Pash for my rage, please don't take it personally.
chrisone wrote: » I feel trust earns respect. You gain trust with your coworkers by doing a good job. Even if someone didnt like you personally he cannot hide that fact that you do a good job at work and at times needs your expertise from time to time. In the end I do believe you should have some respect between your coworkers based off on work. You dont have to respect each other outside of work, just always inside of work, no ifs, ands, or buts. You need to have respect at work in order to complete tasks and for your own psychological health, it would suck going to work everyday and having a problem with someone and always feeling on edge. I myself love my work and try my best to make it the best work environment i could have. That includes being friendly , accepting when your wrong, congratulating others achievements, talking with fellow coworkers, being honest, sharing jokes, helping others with tasks, and not throwing anyone under the bus, or trying to upstage anyone at work!
Bl8ckr0uter wrote: » If it isn't their golden boy, its the developers.
RobertKaucher wrote: » I offer you the following pieces of awesomeness to console you:YouTube - Developers
Use code EOY2025 to receive $250 off your 2025 certification boot camp!