steve13ad wrote: » I'm thinking that when you got the CE moniker, that overrides your lifetime status. Did you get it in writing that you were still lifetime certified?
erpadmin wrote: » Negative. It's in CompTIA's policy that if he should let his CE status expire, his lifetime certs goes back to lifetime. That much I know.
erpadmin wrote: » ...It would appear you gamed the system so that you wouldn't have to take A+ and Network+ for WGU....the A+ and Network+ ce designation you had gotten from CompTIA will actually count against the five years and you won't (shouldn't anyway) have to take A+ and Network+ again. I didn't personally think you could do that but it's CompTIA's fault for letting that loophole of using your Security+ exam you took for lifetime actually count for your CE program...
steve13ad wrote: » Then well played, sir! I wonder how many other people did the same thing.
michaelcox wrote: » thanks. I've wondered that too. There is enough of us on TE that did Security+ in December, I wonder if anyone else has tried.
IT_FAN wrote: » Does one have to pay for three years ($147) in order to receive the CE moniker certifications?
NickDog wrote: » OK, So I'm confused? I currently have my Network+ and A+ from 2004. I am currently studying for Sec+. When I pass my Sec+ exam will I have the chance to bring my Network+ and A+ into the CE program effectively updating those to the current standard?
Paperlantern wrote: » This is very interesting. This was a topic of confusion for myself and I'm sure others a little under 2 months ago in this threadhttp://www.techexams.net/forums/security/60889-uptick-passed-exams.html I had read it that way as well, and thought that I could use my passing of my Sec+ (which at the time was less than 90 days ago) to bring my A+ and Net+ current. However erpadmin had pointed out why that wasnt the case, and after rereading it several more times, based on what he said, it made sense and I didnt think anything of it. But it looks like someone has now actually DONE, what i thought at the time, was me MISREADING the site. Or am I trippin? Perhaps it wasnt as big of a mistake as I had originally thought?