coty24 wrote: » for FREE???? I got picked to go free of charge and my company doesn't like it. I think it's worth it, income < $20 hr.
coty24 wrote: » I got picked to go free of charge and my company doesn't like it.
JDMurray wrote: » Picked by who?
coty24 wrote: » It was the global knowledge/ec-council contest. I got a congratulatory letter and confirmation email. So I'm in free of charge, Global Knowledge is picking up the tab.@Everyone, thank you very much for responding, I will heed everything that was said here. Thank you! I got till sunday night to decide. As of now, I don't have any job backups so a lot is on the line for me trying to accomplish my dream.
powerfool wrote: » Perhaps their contention is that it doesn't support your current activities with the company or responsibilities that they would be willing to give you. Is that potentially the case?
powerfool wrote: » I would not take the training if it jeopardized my job. That being said, it is ridiculous that it would. Honestly, all companies should support you being removed from your work for a minimum amount of time each year, both for the purpose of rest or training and for security purposes. By having you out of your job for a certain period of time, they have a certain level of assurance that you aren't doing anything shady (unless you are, then they have a better chance of exposing that). You need to communicate with them that this is really in the best interest of the organization. I assume that if they are not supporting you to take reputable training for free that they are not likely providing any training on their dime either. Well, you know your situation better than any of us. If I were in a situation making below $20/hour, I would be looking for something that paid more, but that also comes with the premise that you are qualified for work that is more lucrative... and I don't know that. The CEH would likely be at least something that supports the value you provide to a potential employer. Perhaps their contention is that it doesn't support your current activities with the company or responsibilities that they would be willing to give you. Is that potentially the case?
erpadmin wrote: » If this were me, I would have NEVER done what the OP did. I would NEVER resign from any position without having something lined up. Doing that prohibits and/or makes difficult to receive UI. Mind you, I have money in the bank, but steady stream of income is always preferable. If your company sucks that much, you gotta suck it up and wait until the next opportunity presents itself. Then you can leave. Leaving beforehand is foolish, IMHO. Best of luck though, OP. I hope everything is ok! I don't write this for the benefit of the OP, but rather anyone else who might find themselves in a similar situation as the OP. I'm all for gambling and risk tasking (the higher the risk, the higher the reward). Just make sure that your risk is properly calculated and that in the end...it was worth it.
veritas_libertas wrote: » LOL! This thread reminds me of a saying my preacher once told me: "Opinions are like armpits, everyone has one and they all stink time-to-time." I'm not sure I would have chosen the path the OP chose, but I think we have beaten this horse enough. It's dead...