Compare cert salaries and plan your next career move
alan2308 wrote: » With problem #1, I have no idea why it didn't work, when it did when you arrived at problem #2. But for problem #2, I can say with quite certainty that the issue is with the version of java you have installed on your PC. I get the best results with Java 1.6u3. SDM is pretty old now, and things just don't work right with more recent versions of Java.
alan2308 wrote: » Ain't SDM great?
Greenmet29 wrote: » Yea... SDM if extremely finicky at best. When I was studying for my ENT, I spent a whole evening trying to get it working and about 10 minutes actually using it. It was terrible. I would suggest sticking with CLI, I have a feeling that cisco knows how bad sdm is and, for that reason, don't base much of the exam topics on it. That being said, still know it just in case
SdotLow wrote: » Heh, no. I actually don't like it at all. I'd rather be in CLI.
Panzer919 wrote: » Keep that mindset. IMO, you don't need the SDM, just learn everything in the CLI and you will be fine. When the GUI breaks or Java decides to act up your back to GUI anyways so you might as well just stay there. my .02
SdotLow wrote: » That is my feeling as well. I was a bit dumbfounded last night when taking my Exsim-Max practice test and I ran across needing to know specific DHCP configs. It's a good thing I set my SDM to always preview commands before sending them to the router. I'd love to just stay in CLI 100%, trust me lol.
Panzer919 wrote: » I would just stay CLI, don't get caught up in the SDM because it is not going to help you any. I do not know of any network engineers that use SDM in an actual environment. The only thing even close is the ASDM for ASA firewalls, but it is 10000x better than SDM. All your exams will test you on CLI configs and output so I would drop it now before you invest too much time in it.
SdotLow wrote: » I was under the impression the actual Cisco exam will test on being in, and using the SDM environment for DHCP and/or NAT/PAT. I don't want to shoot myself in the foot and not be prepared for a question. You know?
SdotLow wrote: » Yeah I had looked over that, and I didn't see SDM listed on there. I recall someone on the Cisco website study group mentioning it's used in ICND2. I'll have to go look and get some clarification.
Nate--IRL-- wrote: » You think thats bad? Try getting it to work in Linux. Took me hours, and a lot of googling, but I got it working. Nate
QHalo wrote: » If you progress to CCNA Security you'll become even more intimately familiar with it.
SdotLow wrote: » That "was" my plan. Now? I don't know about that. I've heard Cisco will be replacing SDM with something in the near future.
QHalo wrote: » Cisco Configuration Professional - Products & Services - Cisco Systems
hiddenknight821 wrote: » Why would you go through all that trouble? I understand SDM is java-based and only use the web browser, but couldn't you just use virtual machine instead?
hiddenknight821 wrote: » I gotta admit it looks a lot sexier than the sh*tty SDM.
Timber Wolf wrote: » Its mostly just lipstick on a pig.QUOTE] I don't think Miss Piggy would appreciate what you just said. Anyway, the most important thing is that we would be able to get the newer version to work without toying around with it for hours.
Compare salaries for top cybersecurity certifications. Free download for TechExams community.