ACL vs Routing Protocols

Hi there fellows!

I'm studying for my CCNA and I just finished the ACLs and I thought to experiment and what I came up with is to create an extended ACL that will deny Rip (port 520) from sending updates to a router on the far end of the link, the IPs are point-to-point 10.0.0.0/30 and what I want to do is:
Router 1 = FastEthernet 0/0 IP address -> 10.0.0.1/30 and Rip running (no-autosummary and ver is 2)
Router 2 = -||- -||- IP address -> 10.0.0.2/30 and Rip running (-||-)..
On both Routers I have one Loopback interface 0 with another network that I advertise over RIP.

Ok I set everything up the Rip works and the networks are advertised correctly. Now what I want to do is to set an access list on the Router 1 interface as Outbound to DENY Rip updates from going out that interface, I don't want to set it on the Router 2 as Inbound.

Can anyone tell me the ACL syntax to do this? I believe I need to use RIPs multicast but I'm not sure

Find more posts tagged with

Free for TechExams community: Cybersecurity salary guide

Compare cert salaries and plan your next career move

Button

Comments

Dan-Humphreys

Don't count on this being accurate, but I believe the updates are UDP so I'm guessing the syntax would be,

deny udp any any eq 520

Christopher Dobkowski

Dan-Humphreys wrote: »

Don't count on this being accurate, but I believe the updates are UDP so I'm guessing the syntax would be,

deny udp any any eq 520

Nope, still not working

Thanks for help though, appreciate it!

Dan-Humphreys

try tcp instead of udp? or add the same line for both

so deny udp any any eq 520
deny tcp any any eq 520

Zartanasaurus

Outbound ACLs don't filter router generated traffic. You'll have to do it inbound on the other router. Or you could deny everything outbound with a distribute-list.

Christopher Dobkowski

Zartanasaurus wrote: »

Outbound ACLs don't filter router generated traffic. You'll have to do it inbound on the other router. Or you could deny everything outbound with a distribute-list.

Oh my God! I totally forgot about that!!!! Thank You very much!!!!!!!!

Christopher Dobkowski

Dan-Humphreys wrote: »

try tcp instead of udp? or add the same line for both

so deny udp any any eq 520
deny tcp any any eq 520

RIP uses UDP so TCP won't work... But thank's for trying!

DiZz

I believe you can just put rip in instead of the port number, kinda like you can put in eigrp

soo maybe: deny udp any any eq rip

but i dont remember if the version number matters.

LinuxRacr

I think version may matter because Ripv2 uses the multicast address of 224.0.0.9 to send updates I believe.