spiderjericho wrote: » I'm having a hard time registering for the 250 course. I created a Brocade account using a work account but the way to add the course and purchase is so ridiculous. I had to create a purchase order since I only had the option for PO or training units. Brocade could make the process easier.
Maced129 wrote: » email [FONT=&]education@brocade.com and ask if you can pay via credit card. That's what I did, only took a day for them to process.[/FONT][FONT=&] [/FONT]
it_consultant wrote: » In order to answer this without violating Brocade's NDA, I would say (having done both) that CCNA and BCNE are similar except for 4 things, in my opinion. 1 - There are no lab simulations on the BCNE 2 - You will be expected to be able to recognize and troubleshoot LAGs 3 - You will be expected to know QOS 4 - You will be expected to have some detailed knowledge about POE and POE+ BCNE is an honest exam and I found it challenging. One thing that becomes abundantly clear is that Brocade is an engineering company. Whether you are studying for their FICON, FC, FCOE, Ethernet Fabric, or regular Ethernet exams you can expect their to be detailed and challenging questions on the exam(s). *EDIT* I forgot that VRRP and VRRP-E is covered in BCNE, which is also not covered in CCNA.
spiderjericho wrote: » I just took the exam today. I'm a little disappointed. I scored an 83 but felt like I could've scored higher. There were a few areas I was really weak in. 1) The Sales Brochure Portion of the exam. Exam takers need to become familiar with the Brocade portfolio of network devices and modules. This is a key difference with Cisco. Their exams focus on configuring the operating system, protocols and concepts and troubleshooting. You don't have to know about ISR2s, CRS1/3 (though it does creep into some of the exams obviously). 2) Foundry protocols and open-source data link protocols. This wasn't really covered in the Nutshell guide. 3) Quality of Service (It's been awhile since I really delved into QOS, last time being CCNA Voice a few years ago). 4) Physical Layer (copper, fiber, wireless, etc). 5) Multicasting (Last time I delved into it was CCNPv5). The exam is extremely fair. It's not the old Cisco bait and swerve or mind duck. There aren't any simulations, which is good since I have 0 exposure to Brocade devices (and the lab element of the Cisco to BCNE course is terrible). I will say that the exam is not for a CCNA. It's more geared toward a CCNP or someone studying the new CCNA material. A lot of the concepts are more advanced and are not touched upon in the old exams (like QOS, POE, Link Aggregation, Multicast, BGP, etc). Not a bad exam and I don't feel like I threw away $150.