Humbe wrote: » Not a big fan at all of the new logos. When I got the email earlier today I was like No No No No......
beads wrote: » Ummm... I have to said that both Redz and I were a bit more explicit - probably too explicit for the office let alone here on TechExams. But No No No No works well enough. - B Eads
cyberguypr wrote: » All CISSPs are now required to put the new logo on the top of their resume as well as email signatures. The bugger you put it, the more CPEs you get.
cyberguypr wrote: » What do you mean you have no use for the logos? Haven't you heard? All CISSPs are now required to put the new logo on the top of their resume as well as email signatures. The bugger you put it, the more CPEs you get.
JDMurray wrote: » I think the new logos are a visual indication of major changes at the (ISC)2. Things need to be refreshed every once in a while to rejuvenate new business interests.
emerald_octane wrote: » didn't see anything new for associates though.
redz wrote: » EDIT: It's up. It's better than the SSCP/CISSP/Concentrations, worse than the CAP/HCISPP/CCFP... about in line with the CSSLP - personal opinion, of course, and I seem to be able to look past the CSSLP color scheme, somehow.
