I am going to take the exam very, very soon. I am extremely nervous. I hate to say that I couldn't remember many things. Fire suppression of Class A? B? C? D? IEEE version for what? Orange book at which level? Level A???? I mean I am screwed.
I did the practice tests in CCCure and took less than 2 hours to finish each test of 250 questions. Scored over 75%. No, I didn't earn over 80%, a threshold that could almost guarantee a pass. I was damn bored taking the tests.
I don't know what else to do. I just bought the scenario-based questions. I am going through them right now.
And worst, I am partially inebriated.
A totally irrelevant question: is this the way to establish merit/assurance/reliability for the InfoSec field? To drive us crazy and make us nervous??? Or to put it another way: is putting a huge hurdle that will inadvertently (or maybe intentionally) inflict pain, fear, and suffering on candidates the most viable way to establish respectable standard in information security field? Are we trying to emulate the medical field or what? Are we trying to say that, "Look! Doctors don't have it easy and neither do we!"
Why the test? Isn't security about blocking access to unauthorized subjects (trying to speak the language here), about being skeptical to prevent social engineering, about controls to make sure things fall in lines, and about whacking individuals who have the guts to refuse compliance? I smell nihilism and at least pseudo nihilism. Given nihilism, why this test? That's illogical, you think? Are we denying logic but at the same time enforcing logic in controlled environment for, uh, organizational security and human safety? In short, for money and the so-called humanity dressed up by the greedy corporations.
Or maybe, I am too old for this. Maybe, I am little drunk while answering questions in CCCure right now.




:

:

:

