TechGromit wrote: » Watch out for Hawks and Bald Eagles. They see drones as potential competition and will attack. Just takes a good hit from an attaching bird and your pricey drone is scrap when it crashes into the ground.
NotHackingYou wrote: » Congratulations! I wish you much success. Please do update this thread as you go - a lot people are cheering for you.
Bjcheung77 wrote: » For those that didn't know what LLC stands for, it's this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Limited_liability_company
DatabaseHead wrote: » I second. After rereading my post it was brash. My intent was to inform people it's easy, I've done it. If I can do it you can! Anyway back to my original point. Keep us posted, this endeavour sounds extremely exciting!
the_Grinch wrote: » $150 cost for the exam $125 (depends on your state) for LLC registering $30 a month for mailbox (again depends on where you go) $600 to $800 for drone insurance $1600 for drone and extra batteries $60 to $100 a month for cell phone (needed for drone and business) $3000 gets you started and depending on how many jobs you can get going I suspect you could make that back within a few months.
TechGromit wrote: » While I think drones are pretty neat, I do feel they can be misused for invasion of privacy. Kinda gives me a great idea for business of my own. Get a Falcon and train them to attack drones in the sky. Sell my services to people who hate drones. $1,600 to buy a drone. The look when my falcon attacks and destroys your drone in the sky, Priceless.
the_Grinch wrote: » On the legal end, at the very least, you are covered up to 83 feet. Whether your local police department knows that or cares would be an entirely different story.
jibtech wrote: » I believe US v Causby set the limit at 365 feet, not 83 feet. No recompense was ordered below 83 feet, as no flights had occurred at those levels. The court did decide that flights above 365 feet were permissible given the public right of air transit. That said, the courts have frequently sided with the landowner, declaring that flights below 500 feet constituted interference with the landowner. Side note: I race sailboats offshore, and there are three pilots on board who love to discuss this at length. One of those pilots was also involved in the NASA project to identify appropriate separation schemes for UAVs. I am not an expert, but I have been forced to spend several days in close proximity with people who are.
NetworkNewb wrote: » I definitely think it is annoying when my neighbor flies their drone over my house... The only reason they are more invasive in my opinion is because I know it is someone just messing around with a drone for fun over my house and they fly alot closer than any plane or helicopter ever would. Pretty sure there are signal jammers that people are able to make to take em down. But they may also be illegal if you get caught with one... Doesn't bother me enough to actually try to take the drone down though.
jibtech wrote: » I believe US v Causby set the limit at 365 feet, not 83 feet. No recompense was ordered below 83 feet, as no flights had occurred at those levels. The court did decide that flights above 365 feet were permissible given the public right of air transit. That said, the courts have frequently sided with the landowner, declaring that flights below 500 feet constituted interference with the landowner.
TechGromit wrote: » LOL, FAA rules state you can't fly over 400 feet and local laws say you can't fly under 385. Good luck keeping you drone in that 15 feet sweet spot.