fleck wrote: » I mean does it really have to be 7 layers? Data goes from 1. software, through 2. protocols, to the 3. network, through 4. devices, and then does the same in reverse. I count 4 layers, LOL.
WilliamK99 wrote: » If it aint broke......
kalebksp wrote: » Maybe the TCP/IP Model would be more to your liking.
HeroPsycho wrote: » What are you, the George Carlin of the OSI model?
fleck wrote: » Dude, George Carlin on the 10 Commandments is EXACTLY what went through my mind when I was almost done typing that up.
Paul Boz wrote: » I mean c'mon, how hard is it to remember 7 items? When I was prepping for the CCNA back in the day I remembered it as follows: Princess Dianna Never Thought She'd Pancake Asphalt It's tasteless but easy to remember, what can I say.
fleck wrote: » Yeah but you don't have to remember just the seven layers' names, you have to know their function and what goes into each, right? That's just a lot to take in. Fortunately it'll be another month and a half before I'm supposed to take the Network+ exam, so I have a lot of time to revise them daily until I get them. The OSI model will perhaps be my greatest challenge in Network+, probably even my greatest challenge until I get to Cisco (and I've got A+, Security+, MCSA and MCSE to go til then). Simply because it's not formulaic and data-centric like everything else related to computers.
fleck wrote: » ... Fortunately it'll be another month and a half before I'm supposed to take the Network+ exam, so I have a lot of time to revise them daily until I get them.
Kaminsky wrote: » You posted this today yet under your list of certifications under your title you already have Network+ listed ? You've confused me yet again. I'm sure this origional post was meant tongue in cheek but the OSI model isn't used anywhere except maybe in research circles. The OSI model is only used to reference aspects and sub-layers of the networking process which is why it is one of the fundamental things you need to know and understand fully when studying or working in the networking field.
bwillford wrote: » Is it possible the WIP: Network+ he has listed could possibly stand for Work In Progress?
HeroPsycho wrote: » Ah, yes, it was similar, but not funny...
RobertKaucher wrote: » Poor fleck. He's turning into the Dangerfield of this forum...
dynamik wrote: » No clue how I missed that Paul. Awesome