LWB250 wrote: » I won't reveal the class I am facilitating for privacy reasons
NetworkNewb wrote: » Well in your profile you say your working on GSEC, so my deep investigation skills will lead to me believe we have solved that mystery. Best of luck there
cyberguypr wrote: » Doing a good job facilitating is extremely valuable and puts you very close to the top of the list for the next round. I've been accepted to facilitate 5 times but had to decline one. Hoping to do it again this year.
LWB250 wrote: » Heh. Sorry, but wrong. I'm facilitating a different class. I never expected to be chosen, so my choice was something different than GSEC. Thanks!
NetworkNewb wrote: » So you say... So how far down your list did they choose? Hoping others answer this too who have gotten chosen, how far down the list would they go? Has anyone ever got like their 6th or 7th choice? Just surprising to me if they select people for something that isn't towards the top of their list.
LWB250 wrote: » Put my application in last fall before I had any GIAC certs. I was stunned when I got the email inviting me a couple of weeks ago, knowing a couple of people who also applied that have far more experience and certifications than I that weren't invited. Fresh meat, maybe?
Robicus wrote: » Congratulations on your selection! Please let us know how it goes afterwards. Cheers,
LWB250 wrote: » No SANS issues with privacy - I prefer to protect my identity online.
funbagfanatic wrote: » I'll just leave this here, apropos of nothing... https://www.linkedin.com/in/daniel-penoff-3a771119
636-555-3226 wrote: » ::laughing:: Security person who lists what tools their company may use on linkedin loses some of my respect. Knowing your name and where you work, how about I call as a ?new support engineer? from your siem provider and mention (insert random topic here, like how we're having an update issue with some of our recent patches and would like to schedule some out-of-band maintenance at whatever time works best for you). i'm fine with people listing names, where they work, certs, skills, but at some point you need to stop giving out ammo for social engineering or system exploitation.
Iristheangel wrote: » Oh well... so much for privacy... Anyways, OP, what class are you running?
cyberguypr wrote: » Post #7 says it not SEC 401.