Search
-
Re: Are these Contiguous Networks?
I'll take a stab at this and say no, this is not a contiguous network. I say this because the, if you take a look at this page on Cisco website: Why Doesn't RIP or IGRP Support Discontiguous Networks? - Cisco Systems The first line in the introductions states: So the fact that your link between router B and C in ytour… -
Re: Are these Contiguous Networks?
I thought RIPv2 [just like RIPv1] and for that matter every routing protocol other than OSPF auto-summarized unless you explicitly told it not to. Its a huge PITA because auto-summary can break your routing on a well designed network. For example, when I was studying RIP, I created a Hub and Spoke topology. All the LAN… -
Re: Are these Contiguous Networks?
An entire classful subnet should be at one side of a router, which is what makes it contiguous. The word contiguous literally means "alongside or touching". Good network design involves keeping your similar subnets as close together as you can anyway to make for better summarisation - be that automatic or manual. -
Re: Are these Contiguous Networks?
Hi eva,I think what you are trying to say is that all the contiguous subnets should be only on one side of the router for auto-summary to work? am i correct? Most people on networking sites dont make the above thing explicitly clear which had me confused as well. Now I see how contiguous sites can have auto-summary only if…
14 results