Search
-
MTA Security Fundamentals vs Security+
-
Re: MTA Security Fundamentals vs Security+
-
Re: MTA Security Fundamentals vs Security+
That's what I was thinking, too. Because my college uses MTA Security Fundamentals crossed with Security+ for one of the classes. IT 228 - Information Security Fundamentals 5 Presents the principles of information security. Both the managerial and the technical aspects of the discipline are explored and knowledge areas of… -
Re: MTA Security Fundamentals vs Security+
I've taken MTA and currently pursuing security+ what I can tell you is the MTA is just a small skim of security+. I would recommend to just go into security+ but only did it because I wanted a taste to see if I like the security domain of IT, and I love it all of it. So if you know you want get into security because you… -
Re: MTA Security Fundamentals vs Security+
If you are at WGU and have both classes on your degree plan. You can take the Security+ test and request credit for the MTA Security class. You don't get the cert only the CUs toward your degree. IMO. Both are more of networking type classes than security. Both barely scratch the surface on actual InfoSec. -
Re: MTA Security Fundamentals vs Security+
I have taken both of these certifications so I'll give you my thoughts. MTA Security Fundamentals: This is an entry level certification that is specific to Microsoft Products. It is a good primer in security fundamentals and I read the books and watched the CBT Nuggets. While the syllabus may seem basic I find many… -
Re: MTA Security Fundamentals vs Security+
I've taken MTA Networking, Security, and Windows Server Fundamentals. Of the three, Security Fundamentals was the easiest. A lot of common sense questions. Judging by that, I would definitely take Security+. It is probably more comprehensive and rigorous, so more cachet with employers. Some instructors will use the MTAs as…
7 results