Search
-
network x.x.x.x n.n.n.n
Hi, Whats the difference between the following routing network statements, dont they both achieve the same goal: 1. network 172.16.1.1 0.0.0.0 This puts network 172.16.1.0 / 24 into the routing table 2. network 172.16.1.0 0.0.0.255 This puts network 172.16.1.0 / 24 into the routing table Im sure im missing something here?… -
Re: network x.x.x.x n.n.n.n
-
Re: network x.x.x.x n.n.n.n
I already have no auto-summary configured under my eigrp zone, I have however just noticed that although it displays them the same in the routing table, it displays them differently in the running config router eigrp 100 network 1.0.0.0 network 10.0.0.0 network 172.16.0.0 network 196.1.1.1 0.0.0.0 network 197.1.1.0 no… -
Re: network x.x.x.x n.n.n.n
Just did this on Router1 int loopback 196 - ip address 196.1.1.1 255.255.255.0 int loopback 197 - ip address 197.1.1.1 255.255.255.0 router eigrp 100 network 196.1.1.1 0.0.0.0 network 197.1.1.1 0.0.0.255 This is what was displayed in Router2's routing table D 197.1.1.0/24 [90/20640000] via 10.1.3.1, 00:00:38, Serial1/0 D… -
Re: network x.x.x.x n.n.n.n
-
Re: network x.x.x.x n.n.n.n
EIGRP doesn't work the same as OSPF. Try this in OSPF and you'll get the host route you're looking for. What GeorgeMC is saying is that when you do network 196.1.1.1 0.0.0.0 you will only use the interface 196.1.1.1 to participate in EIGRP rather than the whole 196.1.1.0/24 range. I honestly don't know how/or if it's…
6 results