it_consultant wrote: » I have worked with thousands of physical servers between Dell and HP. While HP has not been problem free, they have been less problematic than Dell and certainly less problematic than Cisco. My current employer is a Dell shop and we sat for the Cisco sales pitch for their UCS platform and they were explaining how you could manage all the chassis through a web portal (or whatever) to which I quipped "you mean what HP has been doing for years?". Same thing with Dell and their DRAC cards, HP's ILO is generations ahead of Dell on this. It is important to know the difference between HP the company that sells crappy laptops at Best Buy and HP the company that sells the Compaq/Proliant line of servers. They are totally different entities within HP. If I am not mistaken, they will soon be totally different entities period.
TomkoTech wrote: » I am not talking about a crappy laptop. I am talking about a Proliant Microserver that does not work with the latest version of MS Server due to a hardware problem a little over a year after purchasing it. One would expect that "new" hardware should keep up with software for at least a few years. And while there is a fix(BIOS update) for the issue the fact that I would have to purchase a support plan at double the cost of the server itself to get said update is ridiculous. If this is how they are going to do firmware and what not for the future then they need to include at least 3 years of support on new purchases.